this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
10 points (67.9% liked)

Conservatives

89 readers
87 users here now

Pro-conservative discussions

Rules

  1. Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
  2. We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
  3. Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
  4. Attack the topic, not the person
  5. Report violations of the rules
  6. Downvotes are disabled

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28329298

The White House has dug in on its refusal to return a man who US officials have acknowledged was wrongly deported last month to an El Salvador mega-prison.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on accusations that Salvadoran national Kilmar Ábrego García was a member of the MS-13 gang.

Leavitt also accused the 29-year-old of domestic violence, citing records showing his US citizen wife once filed a protective order against him.

A Maryland judge has ordered President Donald Trump's administration to bring Mr Ábrego García back to the US. But El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said on a visit to the White House this week that he did not "have the power" to return him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If they want to deport him to somewhere other than El Salvador, they will have to restart the 2019 proceedings again. They will have to get a fresh order specifying the new country. Which they can't get because it's a human rights violation, and a violation of the 8th Amendment.

There is no order that allows what you are talking about. There is no valid order allowing for him to be taken anywhere but Maryland.

If they want to start proceedings to deport him to some other nation (assuming there is a third nation to which he has some sort of legal ties), they have to start over as if he had never been sent to El Salvador.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They will have to get a fresh order specifying the new country (which they can’t get because it’s a human rights violation).

That is false. If you’d read the court ruling you’d know that’s false. The only issue is that he was sent to El Salvador. As of yet, nobody else has agreed to take him and nobody has asked.

Most likely they’ll return him to the United States and he will stay in prison here or they’ll ship him to gitmo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you’d read the court ruling you’d know that’s false.

The court did not rule on that issue. You're not getting that from the court. You're getting that from the Trump administration. Specifically, from Trump's Chief of Staff, misrepresenting the issue to the press.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

From chat gpt

Yes, under U.S. immigration law, Kilmar Abrego Garcia could legally be deported to a country other than El Salvador, provided that country agrees to accept him. This is because his “withholding of removal” status specifically prohibits deportation to El Salvador due to the risk of persecution there, but it does not prevent removal to other nations.

However, in Garcia’s case, the U.S. government has not identified any third country willing to accept him, nor has it pursued such an option. Instead, he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March 2025, despite the legal prohibition against doing so. This action was later acknowledged by the U.S. government as an “administrative error.” 

Following his deportation, Garcia has been detained in El Salvador’s Center for Terrorism Confinement (CECOT), a maximum-security prison. Despite a U.S. Supreme Court order directing the government to facilitate his return, both U.S. and Salvadoran authorities have yet to act on this directive. 

In summary, while it’s legally permissible to deport Garcia to a third country other than El Salvador, such an action would require that country’s agreement to accept him, which has not occurred in this case