this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
244 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22829 readers
3471 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Speak for yourself.

Plenty of disabilities have anti-treatment culture because it gets conflated with identity.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/why-deaf-people-oppose-using-gene-editing-to-cure-deafness

https://blog.disabilityinfo.org/a-cure-for-down-syndrome-or-a-celebration-of-chromosomal-diversity/

Your experience may be different, but acknowledge that others' experiences are too. Some of us want the advantages and easier life that effective treatment would provide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I understand that point, but I don't think the comparison to deafness is exactly apropos... Hearing is an objectively useful ability for the survival of a species. Not having it is an objective disadvantage, whether they've built a community around it or not.

On the other hand, autism and neurodiversity has been a boon for humanity. Individual cases at the top end of the spectrum aren't ideal, of course, but the vast majority of people on the spectrum are able to generally be productive members of a society that was not built with them in mind.

And more than that, they've often ended up becoming some of our most well-loved scientists, inventors, artists, etc.

Even if you don't want to say that it's a good thing for humanity, you cannot deny that it's neutral at the very least.

Personally, I do not think there is a "cause" beyond just natural genetic diversity within a species. Which is healthy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is exactly my point though: What if people with autism weren't disadvantaged in society? Then the idea of "curing" it would be meaningless.

I understand that you're frustrated by the challenges you've dealt with in your life, and I acknowledge that I'm speaking from a place of privilege as someone that doesn't have any disability. But personally I'd rather see a world where people don't feel like they're disadvantaged for not matching the status quo than a world where everyone is equal just because everyone is the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

What if people with autism weren't disadvantaged in society?

Okay, even if every person in the world magically didn't find autistic behaviors offputting or subconsciously uncanny, and they were willing to be extremely accommodating, go out of their way to overcome communication issues, life would still be a chore

Sensory issues, executive function, and difficulties learning, are internal issues some of us face.

It's a developmental disorder plain and simple, disability for many. It isn't all rainbows and sunshine and "everyone is special in their own way". But everyone seems to forget this because everyone wants to be positive and accommodating.