this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
356 points (98.4% liked)

News

35915 readers
3256 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 46 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I don’t understand this legislation at all. You already have to be a citizen to vote. This just makes voting harder.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 80 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No you understand it perfectly. The entire point is to make it harder for people to vote.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 45 points 10 months ago

And to deny women, minorities, and the poor their right without spelling it out.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

So, you do understand this legislation, because that's the point.

It makes it notably harder for:

  • full-time unskilled/low-skilled workers (particularly those that don't have lenient schedules for non-work obligations that have to happen during working hours, like dealing with City Hall)

  • people who live far away from where they were born

  • people with limited transportation options

  • married women who changed their name (name no longer matches birth certificate)

  • transfolk whose birth certificate reflects their deadname.

Basically...Democrats. Or at least a hell of a lot more Democrats than Republicans.

[–] IonAddis@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

It also makes it harder for people who have lost some of these documents.

I went through foster care and in that transition my original birth certificate was lost--I was a minor and had no idea I should look for it, or where it even was, to take it with me. It was hard to bootstrap myself after. Anyone who's lived through a domestic violence situation might have had to leave home suddenly with very little.

And that's not considering natural disasters like floods and fires and tornados that might have destroyed paperwork for people too.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

That is the point. They know that they’re going to get fucking wrecked in any fair election going forward. Obviously, the solution is to make elections unfair by making it way harder to vote and way easier to challenge voter validity - a problem that, I should emphasize, is vanishingly rare. In fact, the highest incidence of voter fraud in recent years has come from Republican voters.

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago

Sounds like you understand the legislation perfectly well.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I don’t understand this legislation at all.

Republicans can only win by utilizing two strategies.

Misinformation and voter suppression.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The point is that you need to be able to prove you're a citizen. The WH get to decide what is accepted a proof.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago

Putting up barriers to committing a crime is more effective than punishment after the fact. It's already illegal to commit crimes with firearms, that doesn't mean they should repeal the Brady Bill. This also undermines the narratives about muh stolen election.