Bogs are also where you bury the bodies so they're nice and fresh next time you get the urge to do a little necromancy.
IonAddis
I finally understood the sovcit guys when I realized they're basically trying to cast magic spells. If you speak the right magic words at the right time, your miracle happens. Or curse or blessing or whatever.
Thanks for the heads up.
Yep, a preview for what's being done to the US now
Maybe the ghost of Robert A. Heinlein is haunting it.
(I will never not be angry that Musk stole the word from one of the classic sci-fi writer greats.)
I don't know about orphaned, but my guardians got $300/month in the 90s because my mom was on social security disability. And when I was still with my mom, I think she got $700/month on social security disability. That's with me included?
Obviously this is different from what orphans would get, and 25+ years ago. But if Musk had stolen it from us then, our situation would've been even worse...and it wasn't great to begin with. Even back then, with my mom having an incurable disability, she had to be careful of how much money extra she made from odd jobs lest they take it all away (people on disability aren't allowed to save or have above X amount in income or the benefits will be revoked). And apartments in the area were $700/month, and we weren't in section 8 housing so all of her benefits went to rent--and that was before utilities, food, etc.
From what I've heard, similar restrictions are in place now. Nobody's getting a plush ride on benefits, ever, and it's a struggle to even get on them to begin with. Even with things that are 100% disabling and incurable.
I’ve talked before about how I feel like there are people who like to “paint the tape” of a comments section by leaving a handful of super-forceful comments in one particular direction, to paint the narrative they like to paint, if the comments section starts to develop in a way that they don’t like. Try sorting by “top” and compare it to the current comments section, if you want to get a better picture of what the consensus is.
Yeah, I think you're right. I poked my head into these threads to see what was up, mostly because I was confused as to why Obama showed up on BlueSky talking about ACA when there's other stuff going on (trying to understand what he's attempting), and for some reason this topic seems to have gotten the weirdos stirred up hard, mostly as you said with very confidently-worded assertions that appeared suspiciously quickly.
I wonder if it's because they're trying to capitalize on any old hot-button emotional spittakes left over from Obama's days as president. I mean, there's a lot of very important things going on with DOGE and it might serve certain interests well if we're distracted from THAT danger and instead talking about Obama who doesn't seem to be doing anything pertinent at the moment.
I’m just curious if spaces such as that even exist, and if they do, what they lead to.
I don't know about lemmy since I'm old enough to not care to go looking for that, but I can speak in generalities from a few decades back.
So, I ran an old-school forum in the late 1990s/early 2000s. I found that a complete lack of moderation leads to bad actors essentially ruining the vibe. Basically, there are human beings (and bots plied by state actors in this day and age) that will happily exploit a fully-unmoderated forum and fill it full of awful stuff.
Now, bad mods are awful, power-tripping and all, and lots of regular people who have never run a community of any sort have had run-ins with mods that have the HOA Karen mentality and come to the not-entirely-correct conclusion that ALL moderation is bad, but having no mods can ALSO kill a community if it gets big or noticed enough to draw in outsiders, because you end up with the bullies running roughshod over everyone else, and changing the vibe. And if the vibe gets too gross, you lose the decent, cool members because they'll fuck off elsewhere and do their thing elsewhere because your community is too full of bullshit and crap.
I suspect that's the point, this admin is being told to do things that will further humiliate the US on the world stage and further erode the respect the US (no longer) gets.
Hm, probably DIY?
Start with a mirror, then get some foam board or plyboard that's bigger than your mirror, and cut a hole the mirror will go into. Then get some silver paint and some other colors of paint and do the rest. It would probably be easier if you had one of those projector-things that can project what you want to draw onto a surface, because then you could probably project a screenshot from actual Paint onto the surface to give you a guide so the art is more accurate.
Or is there some doodad these days that'll print color onto a (large) transparent sticker you can just stick onto something? That might be easiest. Maybe a sign shop could do something like that?
what the fuck are historians going to point at in the US that lead to the rise in fascism? fucking gamergate? The self-inflicted 2008 crisis?
Losing the Cold War. America wasn't beaten militarily, but brought down via foreign propaganda. (It also hit the UK, with Brexit, and other countries with similar harmful things going on domestically to them.)
Livejournal was one of the earliest "modern" social media sites (for those who didn't experience it, it was like a longer-form tumblr--longer text posts, fewer images), and it was sold to a company in Russia in the early 00s. I remember scratching my head as a 20-something about why the servers kept going down, then I learned that intellectuals in Russia had taken it up as THEIR social media and due to politics "on the Russian" side it was getting DDoS'd.
I was still too young to connect the dots then, or understand what all that really meant (hindsight is always much better, isn't it?) but basically they perfected control via social media first on their own people, probably trawled through all the content of the original LiveJournal users posting in English, then perfected using what they learned there on later social media sites.
And because Americans A) thought the Cold War was over, and B) have a bit of a head-scratcher conundrum when it comes to free speech because it's valued so highly and nobody likes censorshiop, nobody did anything or even realized anything was happening until the harm was already done.
Personally, again with hindsight, I think company-designed social media algorithms that just suggest content to you as "trending" or whatever should be illegal (and block buttons should be mandatory). Users should have to be forced to follow, one by one, the content they want to subscribe to.
Having "trending" algorithms that have no transparency in what they show or boost allows malignant actors to game the algorithm.
If you force people to follow others based on word of mouth or reblogs from their actual friends, and give people a way to solidly block someone that's easy to find and instant to use, it will cut a lot of the bullshit down. People will be somewhat less inclined to fall down wells of stupidity. It won't completely stop it, but people are lazy and if you don't dangle shit in front of their nose many will go off and do something else instead of putting in the effort to find something horrible.
They might be tracking the homeless who are living in their vehicles. As well as poor laborers who might be hiring out to do work for cash.