this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1193 points (99.6% liked)

News

35915 readers
3224 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Mostly because it had a garbage engine. The one they used in the movies was modified with a much better engine.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

The fact that the real Delorean couldn't do 88 miles per hour was part of the joke.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah okay.

I have no idea about cars or engines

[–] bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, the reason why they chose 55 mph in the movie is that was the max speed of the car (if i remember right)

Also the way the doors opened were pretty inconvenient

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

It was 88 mph, which is a speed that the original engine for the DeLorean was not capable of.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The flux capacitor is activated when it reaches 88mph. They had to add a digital speedometer because the Delorian's only went to 85.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That was typical of cars made (for US market) in the early to mid 80s... Can't remember for sure if it was part of the whole national 55mph speed limit, but I'd bet it was.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

it wasn't a good car, It just looked unique.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The suspension had to be raised to meet new pedestrian safety standards. This ruined the handling.

They couldn't get the engine they really wanted (a Mazda rotary) and had to go with a GM piston engine instead. Then, new US emissions standards hit and it had to be downrated to meet those. EU models were better, though engine design in general was kinda in the shitter around this time.

People think it's heavy because of the stainless steel, but those are thin panels over fiberglass. Its weight is in the same ballpark as what Ferrari was putting out at the time.

The first alternator they used did not have enough power for all the accessories to be on at once. People got stranded at night because of this, including Johnny Carson (who was an early investor). These were upgraded later.

Then there's some manufacturing difficulties. The early models have creases embedded on each side of the hood. Forming the stainless steel that way often broke it at the factory. Later models have a completely flat hood.

As the company's finances dwindled, DeLorean himself was caught in an FBI sting operation where he was accused of selling drugs to try to keep the company afloat. This ended up being a setup by the FBI--with Larry Flynt coming to the rescue, of all people--but it plunged the company's reputation even more.

It was a shitty time to make a sports car. Lots of stuff happening at once that made them bad at what they are. Make it 5 years earlier or 5 years later and it's an entirely different story. Even that might be generous; 1980s sports cars are known more for their angular looks than actual driving ability. It wouldn't be until the 1990s that companies started to figure out how to work within the new regulations. Then you get legendary bangers again like the Supra MkIV.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It wasn’t hated. It just wasn’t a good car.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You misspelled Mandalorian