this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
726 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31431 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is exploring legal pathways to “deport” U.S. citizens to El Salvador, where the administration has already arranged to house deported immigrants in a prison known for its human rights abuses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 100 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Of course he does.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

First they came for the socialists ... But the US was coming for the socialists at the time, so that part is left out at the Holocaust museum memorial.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Actually first they came for LGBTQ+ people and scientists studying controversial subject matter, but the guy who wrote the poem was a conservative Catholic priest, so he didn't mind.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Worse than that, he was part of a group that carved out special exemptions for their churches with Hitler. And was a raging anti-semite until his death bed iirc.

So a traditional conservative who only saw evil when it affected him. And only insofar as HOW it affected him.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago

That makes it a better poem in retrospect, imo. It demonstrates its own moral

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man, can you imagine hating on your deathbed? I'd think of the slightly less shitty times.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A piece of garbage that has a far better legacy than he deserves.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, his legacy is about regretting a mistake for not standing up for others even if he doesn't like them. I don't think that's a legacy of doing good even if it's a good legacy. I think he has the legacy he deserves; being known for failing to do what's right even when others died doing so.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

You have a very good point. Not even remotely remorseful for being motivated by blind hatred, but able to at least consider the babies of a basic ethical framework based solely on pragmatism.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

Actually, first they came for physically and mentally handicapped. The clergy spoke up because they were the first to notice that the families in their church with vulnerable individuals were all receiving letters that their family member had died while getting government-mandated "treatment" in a government hospital.

Hitler was "shocked, " and pledged to end the program. Instead, it went underground, and evolved into the Holocaust.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's why I'm speaking out for these political prisoners in El Salvador. If they are criminals, then kick them out, but there has to be due process. This is AMERICA, everybody gets their day in court.

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If they are criminals?? Brother we are all gonna be criminals soon

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I meant violent criminals, but I get your point, and agree. Especially without due process, and HitlerPig claiming to be the sole arbiter of what is the law, anyone could be deemed a terrorist at any time. My post history will certainly get me designated as a terrorist.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He already did and a judge ruled that he had to be brought back

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

And hasn't been, last I checked. The excuse provided will infuriate you even more.