this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13300 readers
2 users here now
Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's still impressive, but they only changed 14 genes. These are much more wolf than dire wolf.
Genuine question. How many genes were different in the original dir wolf?
Also elsewhere said 20 genes were changed. But I've no reason to consider that source better then yours.
Ancient DNA is pretty degraded, so it's hard to get an exact number. It's estimated they diverged more than 5 million years ago, so it's probably hundreds or thousands of different genes.
wikipedia article
Thanks.
Also thanks for pointing out I mixed genes and traits. Was a video I saw so me missing it makes perfect sense.
Not only that, but grey wolves aren't even the closest related existing species, and some scientists that work at Colossal wrote the study saying as much. If you want to call it a new species, sure, I could see it, but a dire wolf it is not
Wait, which one is? Dogs?
African Jackals are closest based on what I have seen. Dire wolves and north American canids might share a common ancestor, though
They separated pretty far back, so they're about equally related to jackals, dogs, wild dogs, various wolf species, and coyotes.
Yep, still pretty much sleazy clickbait hype. I guess actually reproducing the whole genome was too expensive.