this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
225 points (86.9% liked)

Games

37571 readers
1443 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In another bullshit move by Nintendo this time around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least it gives people who are using their switches a chance to buy one, instead of them selling out in seconds to a network of bot accounts before winding up on eBay for $300+ the following week.

It’s not the perfect system, but I can understand why they are doing it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I am using my Switch just fine without an online subscription. I guess Nintendo thinks I am using it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right, but he sub is shareable and a pretty cheap barrier for entry... and required to play those GameCube games anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nintendo opting to forgo selling retro games piecemeal and instead expecting consumers to rent access to them in perpetuity is an anti-consumer move.

I have no problem paying for games when they're sold at affordable, reasonable prices, so until that's the case for Nintendo's library, better to just emulate as much of it as possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Sure, but that's a different issue; I agree with that. Don't forget that if you even are allowed to 'buy' them, they will close the online service for that platform in the future with no guarantee you can use it on another platform.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I don't need it to play Smash with friends on the couch.

Really I shouldn't need the subscription for GC ports either. What's wrong with making them individual purchases like on the 3DS? (Answer: that's not monthly recurring revenue.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can you think of a better way to keep it mostly out of the hands of scalpers?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Put the onus on the retailer to limit how many units a single customer can purchase. Why would Nintendo give a single fuck about scalpers, anyway?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They must enter a unique switch serial number (that corresponds with inventory) to make the purchase? Don't see why it has to be contigent on a subscription.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

That would work if serial numbers weren't visible without even opening the box the device came in, and I'm they are even included on the receipt for the device. Scalpers would absolutely have a ton of serial numbers just lying around from unsold devices, or even devices they sold and just hope the owner of won't bother attempting a purchase of the thing they are scalping.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Make enough of them that scalping isn't profitable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's a fine solution long term I guess, but things take time to be made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, there’s plenty of reasons to not like Nintendo, but this whole thing is because the GameCube coming to their Online subscription. So I mean… it makes sense.