this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
410 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

14403 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

I work as a software engineer and honestly, it's ridiculous how often I'm asked to or tempted to violate the laws of physics.

There's classics like measuring how long it takes to send a network packet from one device to another โ€“ you can't, because the two devices might have wildly different understandings of what time it currently is. The only way to get an accurate measurement is by measuring how long it takes to send it there + back (a.k.a. the round-trip time).
And then you divide that by 2 and pretend there's no asymmetry in transmission speed, nor delay between the other device receiving it and sending it back. ๐Ÿ‘

In our previous project, we were recording audio chunks of one second each and then feeding it into a detector. At some point, we got asked, if we could reduce the delay until the user gets feedback from the detector. Also, we can't make the detector detect things more often, because it might make more mistakes. Alright, I guess, I'll just break up the time continuum then and give the user feedback before it has finished recording. ๐Ÿ‘

And now in our current project, we're supposed to send network packages across the globe and also we basically can't have any latency. Yeah, so there's this thing called the speed of light/causality at about 300000 km/s. Halfway around the globe is about 20000 km. That leaves us with 66.7 ms of latency, at its theoretical minimum. Guess I'll just quickly invent a way to create worm holes, no problem. ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Send it through the earth, you can reduce it theoretically to 42.5ms (using mean radius and speed of light in vacuum).

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Send it through the earth, you can reduce it theoretically to 42.5ms

This isn't as ridiculous as it sounds and you just need a neutrino-beam... which has a horrible bandwidth (of 0.1 bits/s) plus the ridiculous upfront cost of running two particle-accelerators for a full-duplex link. (Google it up, this exists.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)