this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
540 points (78.2% liked)

Comic Strips

15795 readers
1726 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
540
Safe professions (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Thanks to @[email protected] for finding the original author:

https://www.instagram.com/linhadotrem/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And that's a good thing, if and only if you provide pathways to other jobs or phase workers out slowly i.e. by retirement.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or provide UBI to share the wealth generated by increased societal productivity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I have had a number of conversations with relatively reasonable conservatives, where I've brought up the dangers of so many jobs moving toward automation with no additional job creation. And steering the conversation carefully, I got them to at least consider the idea of UBI funded by taxing any and all automation. I also got them (with the "everybody should have to work, people shouldn't get life handed to them for free" mentality) to agree that the rise in automation should mean people working less hours each, so everyone still has jobs (basically, UBI and changing "full time" to 25 or 30 hours, where people get overtime past that... creating more jobs while peoples needs are still covered).

It's amazing, sometimes, how starting with some similar premises (people should have to work, which I mostly agree with) and shared threat (automation taking jobs) can lead to some more open minds for things that they would otherwise be adamantly against.