this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
83 points (92.8% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
11576 readers
127 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is the notion that I always hated growing up. We are humans interacting with other right right fucking now. And we are doing so over the internet.
The internet is a literal communications tool for fuck's sake!
There is a noticable difference in electronic communication. Before the internet there were plenty of people that hated being on the phone instead of face to face. Something is lost with each loss of the physical experience. From in person to voice to text. Granted video calls actually are a bit of an improvment to a phone call as far as human connection goes.
Yes, there’s something lost, but there’s something gained as well. By linking to things, we can refer people to a source without sending them to the library. We can show others photos or diagrams without having to carry them around in our pockets all the time. We aren’t bound by time or distance.
yet so many sources are of questionable quality and so rarely are the pictures of anything useful. We have greatly increased efficiency but often have lost quality.
I'm sure people made the same arguments against writing letters and the telegraph.
Only 80 years ago, maths profs literally picketed calculators being allowed in schools. 🤓
true but I think they had a point then. especially given the limits of the telegraph. thats like email and the original text message in some ways.
What do you mean original text message?
Probably referring to SMS protocol, 160 7-bit characters.
In a few years the newer phones automatically started just telling you how many messages long your message was.
You'd end up shortening things sort of like a telegram.noSpacesSomeTimesToSaveChars etc. but it's own style. txting it was called, because "txtMe" is a lot shorter than "text me back, please".
And they weren't free so you'd pay by the SMS.
And when you were txting your crush and heard the Nokia sms... and then another, you'd know there was a longer message. Or having a row with them, in which case it wasn't necessarily a good thing.
And sometimes you'd run out of room on your phone (because the memory only supported like 48 messaged or smth), you'd get a message, start reading it, then it'd say "cont", but your message memory full icon is flashing (same as got a message, but flashing instead of just the letter icon).
Idk what the argument is but that's what "original text message" means to me.
yup. thats essentially what I meant. email could be a book but sms was limited in size.
Unless you are a bot, interacting with orher bots. Damn, I feel old thinking how the internet used to be good.