this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)
Liberal Gun Owners
715 readers
9 users here now
A community for pro-gun liberals.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have the APX Carry, not the A1.
It is a perfectly adequate gun. I have no strong feelings for or against it. I admittedly haven't shot it in years, but I do remember mine shot several inches low. I also remember one or two malfunctions in the few hundred rounds I've had through it, but that was cheap range blasting ammo.
If you look at pictures of the old Beretta Nano and the APX Carry side by side, you can clearly tell that's its lineage, not the APX full size.
The magazine capacity is obsolescent in the now crowded market of "micro-9s" which hold a minimum of 10 flush, but you can still make it work. This is likely the main reason why they are being offloaded at a markdown.
That sounds like exactly what I was hoping to get out of it. I have a G23 and Ruger SR40c for all the times I can effectively conceal one of them on my person. I was used to carrying a Pico years ago which has a strict capacity of 6+1 in .380 so the small capacity in a 9mm doesn’t put me off too much.
You weren’t kidding about the nano. There’s a clear relation there. I’ve ready a few other reports about the A1 carry hitting low too. The general consensus was the heavy and “gritty” trigger pull was causing an overcompensation in anticipation of the recoil. I’m hopeful a few hundred round of mindful practice can iron that out for me.