this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
371 points (98.2% liked)

News

35962 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On the plus side, I smell a great opportunity for a longitudinal population study. πŸ€”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

DISCLAIMER: This is only true to the population that does take care of their teeth, which means that it will actually negatively affect some people in a serious way.

While stopping the usage of fluoride in water is a bad decision that will lead to people having more dental issues, I would like to say that there are other developed nations that don't have fluoride in their water and it's not the end of the world. Because in modern times people use toothpaste and dental floss and have all of this routine that most people do twice a day, the fluoride in the water is not nearly as significant as that routine.

I don't have the research right now but I do remember that I once dove into it and most of the studies are pretty old and the dental hygiene that we have today did not exist to the same degree and therefore fluoride in the water was a more significant additive.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised how many people don't brush their teeth, let alone twice a day, and let alone floss. Those who do the correct shit will probably not feel the difference, those who don't will lose the only protection they had left.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it will definitely hurt some populations a lot.

I take it back.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Rural dental care is notoriously poor in the US. Also, for some ridiculous reasons, dental care is treated separately from medical care when it comes to insurance. I know people who can't afford to go to the dentist and one who is lucky to have access to low cost dental school care. Putting fluoride in water at least helps those who don't or can't take good care of their teeth.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I was actually wondering if it's still necessary if every toothpaste already has fluoride in it. It's probably still better to keep adding it just in case, since there's no real downside to doing it. But I guess we'll see in a generation what the long term effect is.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It's absolutely still necessary. There's a hundred reasons someone isn't brushing their teeth and it's a crucial support for them.

[–] matjoeman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

There's flouride free toothpaste and the kind of people who don't want flouride in their drinking water also don't buy toothpaste with flouride in it.