this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
202 points (98.6% liked)

News

35703 readers
2797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have condemned the House-passed spending bill and vowed to vote against it when it comes up in the Senate, even as other Democrats say they’ll support it to avert a government shutdown.

...

All four Black Democratic senators said they will vote against the continuing resolution.

Archived at https://archive.is/ydt8f

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Unless it is enough anti-votes to stop the CR, then this is just posturing in attempt to make up for not doing a goddamn thing until now

I used to regularly vote for Hakeem Jefferies, did that motherfucker has lost my boat forever.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I used to be into sailing, too. Maybe you could get another boat?

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody should have to be a sailor just to get equal representation under the law.

Everyone within the jurisdiction of the United States is, according to the constitution, accord that. I don’t need to “go sailing more” in order to deserve equal rights. Nobody does, and nobody should ever have to be.

Shame on you for putting conditions on fairness under the law.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'll not accept your shame. I just thought you enjoyed sailing. Perhaps just getting down to the shore, liminal space, would help. And to be clear, equal representation under the law, that's the promise. Nobody, not even I said you need to be a sailor. smh.

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Now you know better than to assign your own aspirations to an Internet stranger who has already vociferously disagreed with you.

May you take this lesson into the future for better communication with other.s

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 11 months ago

Yess'em. Cap'n!

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Ironic comment, considering their own antics so far on Lemmy.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not to get in the way of someone not voting for Hakeem Jefferies, but he's in the House, which voted nearly unanimously (one breakaway) against the CR.

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The continuing resolution had to be approved by the house before it went to the Senate. Hakeem Jeffries was certainly involved.

I’ve never been more disappointed in all my life

Except for when I learned it that both of my parents were malignant, narcissist and neurologically, incapable of perceiving the concept of “love”, but at least they had the good sense not to run for public office.

You may call that bias, I just say that it’s further motivation to support a pluralistic and equitable democracy

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, he was involved in organizing all but one of the Democratic caucus members to vote against it. And the one vote they lost wasn't the difference in it passing. That was pretty close to the maximal amount of opposition for the thing you're pretending to be angry about.

I'm assuming that you're trying to do some kind of bit, but it's too confused a character to actually have an underlying statement or joke.