this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
335 points (99.4% liked)

World News

35249 readers
395 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

While I get that people try to hurt Tesla's sales, please don't set random people's property on fire. You might destroy the live of someone who bought a car before Edolf Musk rose to power and displayed the extent of his insanity.

Couldn't care less for Tesla's fresh out the factory tho

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm half joking here, but are we really sure the source of the fire was external?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Teslas aren't prone to spontaneous combustion

(For the half that wasn't joke)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are a lot of Teslas that caught fire while driving or even parked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Searching I found one Tesla 3 that caught fire after hitting road debris, several that caught fire after being shot at, several that caught fire after a collision, and many destroyed in arson attacks

Please link some of these "many that caught fire while driving"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

That's true. In an unrelated note there's a tesla gigafactory near Berlin. Also, there's a brand new train track to it. Also unrelated, I heard fires are really bad for train tracks.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Most car insurance covers fire, so i hope the owners can collect and buy a different car.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I recently saw a Tesla here with a sticker on its back reading:
"I bought this before Elon went crazy"

Those will probably get wildly popular to secure their cars

And I'm all with you, that destroying people's property is just a shit move...

Edit: and forgot to add:
There are still quite some anti-EV people around, that just seem to hate on EVs in general
If such a fucker destroys my Renault EV, I'd be more than just pissed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

national "buy comprehensive" day would be a pretty strong signal to send

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, English isn't my first language, so I'm not sure what you mean with "buy comprehensive"

It's a bit hard to describe for me, how I understand it, without just translating it directly ;⁠-⁠)
(Would be "umfassend" if that helps)

So, I understood it like extensive, exhaustive

But I'm not sure how that would translate to my shopping.
Would I just buy everything I need all at once?
But what signal would that send?

I guess, I just don't understand it correctly.

Thanks for helping me out here, I'm a bit stuck here...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They are referring to the insurance policy covering the vehicle. Comprehensive insurance covers vandalism and fire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, comprehensive insurance!
Ok, thanks!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm not excusing burning down innocent people's property, but Teslas are not cheap.

I doubt anyone who'd lose one would have their life destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So what are we saying? Destruction of people's property is cool if it passes some arbitrary threshold that seems like they must be "well off" to own that property?

Does that also mean it's cool to rob anyone who owns a macbook, on the assumption they'd have a cheaper laptop if they weren't loaded?

Where I live, the taxi drivers primarily are driving Teslas and other electric cars because they do crazy mileage for their job and so over time the Tesla is actually the most economical choice for them. And that's just a regular working class job.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm saying it's cool if the property belongs to a Nazi or a Nazi sympathizer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m not excusing burning down innocent people’s property

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well you said those words, but then followed on by saying what seems to be an excuse for exactly that - effectively they are rich so they can afford it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The original commenter said that burning down Teslas might destroy the owners life. This is a car that costs somewhere between 40000 (?) and 150000 dollars. Someone who can afford that is highly likely to recover. That's what this commenter pointed out.

Stating that isn't saying that it's cool to burn down a random person's car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

People regularly buy vehicles significantly above their means for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Many people save up for such a major expense, like a car
So they save up for years, because they really would like to have that one specific car and then some idiot comes around and destroys it, because he doesn't like the owner of the manufacturer

And many people bought it while Tesla was pretty much the only decent EV

and even if the driver could buy the car without selling his kidney, it doesn't mean, that he has a bunch of cars in his home