this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1470 points (98.5% liked)

News

37030 readers
2269 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did not see this published outside of India. But not sure why. It’s all based on Xitter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 367 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Imagine having more money than anyone's ever had

Being stressed, depressed, drug addicted, and an actual Nazi.

Times like this I think about Enya. Yeah, Enya. Where's she been? In a fucking castle. With a fuck ton of kitties.

She made her millions and said "oh golly, I don't need to do much of anything anymore. And I quite like castles and kittens."

She didn't say "what can I do to make more people like me?" And then please the most hateful people on earth. How are these paths even a choice one has to ponder? Go fuck off in a castle full of cats.

[–] Nora@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's kinda crazy to me because let's say you do want to be the most beloved person on earth AND you have more money than anyone ever, you could do that?

Like at one point musk said if there was a plan to end world hunger in 6 billion dollars he would do it, and of course he didn't... But if he did, a small fraction of his infinite wealth would be gone, but people would have loved him.

If, Tesla actually produced a fully self-driving electric car that was better and cheaper than anything else, he'd have even more fans than he currently does.

If, he actually created high speed mass transit, instead of whatever the fucking "hyperloop" thing he made is.

He could have done probably all of this for the price of twitter, but nah instead he had to go be a nazi.

Doing like even half this list would make him beloved by the average person who isn't too interested in him. They'd see all the good he does and say "That's what a billionaire should be." and not do any digging. It's honestly batshit insane to me that someone can say "everyone hates me and it makes me sad but I'm not going to do anything about this because clearly they are the ones that are wrong."

Like how do you fuck it up so bad. The first time I heard of the guy I bought into that "elon musk is ironman" persona thing, and now he's just a crazed nazi I want nothing to do with.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Narcissism, ego, and wealth create one hell of a combination.

He wants to be worshipped by the masses, but he's also the kind of person who needs to appear powerful and can't stand being in any position but first. He has to be the richest person while also being the most adored, and he isn't willing to sacrifice anything to achieve the latter.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

He also thinks he’s Tony fucking Stark.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the difference between the ultra-wealthy of the gilded age and today. Those of the gilded age built things with their wealth for the public, so they wouldn't turn against them. Today they think they're untouchable. They hoard their wealth and don't try to do anything with it.

Yet, the gilded age came to an end with regulations, because they were amassing too much wealth. They only had a small fraction of what the ultra-wealthy today have. Something needs to be done about them, and the government isn't taking action...

[–] pohart@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

The government is taking action, just not the action we'd like.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

According to Harvard Business School, in 1937 J. D. Rockefeller's net worth amounted to 1.5% of GDP. In today's wealth, that would amount to about $415.8 billion. And to be honest, I have more faith that the Rockefeller number represents an accurate representation of the real, if not necessarily liquid, wealth that he commanded, whereas rather more of the modern-day billionaires' wealth is smoke and mirrors based on their own bullshit evaluations of what their assets are theoretically worth.

It's still a contest between which dragon is lying on top of a bigger hoard of ill-gotten gold, but those gilded age fucks were really historically impressive.

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We really need to start dragging useless billionaires out on the streets and just stringing them up.

Mark Cuban is cool, he's doing billionaire stuff the right way. And he's never had any sexual assault allegations, as far as I know.

[–] Lennnny@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He's still a billionaire though right? That billion dollars still belongs to him, right? As in, he has it, we don't. As long as he has a BILLION of the credits most of us struggle to find a thousand of per month to pay rent, he's not a good guy, he's a wealth hoarder like the rest of them.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago

Like at one point musk said if there was a plan to end world hunger in 6 billion dollars he would do it, and of course he didn’t… But if he did, a small fraction of his infinite wealth would be gone, but people would have loved him.

Not just that, but an NGO said we could do it in that budget and he bought Twitter with the money instead

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For him it was his parents and South Africa. Drugs + environmental influence is the guaranteed way to create a monster.

Basically his entire childhood he understood that there are two classes of people: the people who earned something, and the other is the rest of us. People who look different, have to work, or talk funny.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget his trans daughter. Pretty sure that she was a catalyst.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

all that turned out to be scams, his charities, the hyperloop was meant to stop california from developing thier own fast rail system.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Its because lying about doing it or considering it works out enough why actually do it

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does anyone know if she needs someone to help care for the kitties...?

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I selflessly offer to do this for a modest sum of 100k per year.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

un does she need someone to be another kitty?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If she adopts us both, I will feed you, brush you, trim your claws, etc!

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We were just having a similar discussion, though not about Enya. My position was if I had a billion dollars, you know what I would do? I'd recreate Hogwarts Castle. I'm not even a huge Harry Potter fan and hate what's-her-name, but how cool would it be to live in a beautiful movie set house the size of a small town?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a venereal disease. Though to be fair, so did 'Hogwarts'

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Sorry babe, you're gonna have put the blindfold on, the warts on my hog are back

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd make sure I had enough money to live comfortably, travel lots, etc. Then I would get busy trying to give the rest of it away.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I had Musk money, I would commission lots of hentai media and bribe politicians to give more rights to everyone. No more porn bans in Texas, science-based textbooks in schools, term and age limits on SCOTUS, sex work is protected work, buy anime & cartoon IP to make it public domain, ect.

...if only.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be on a beach, half drunk, with a book. That's it. Y'all are crazy making more work for yourselves lol.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

unlike jk rowling using her wealth and fame to become a "terf", i think shes buddy buddy with musk too. she must be constantly depressed and stressed from that too. and many pointed out her books are actually low-key her prejudices. also family guy has pointed this issue out 2 different cutscenes too.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago

Turns out, having obscene levels of wealth and power is really bad for your psyche.

We talk a lot about taxing billionaires for the good of the 99%, but it would do wonders for the well-being of the 1% as well.

[–] dejpivo@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

I didn't expect to learn about Enya in this discussion. Thank you, kind sir!

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not to defend Musk, but there are plenty of examples of money destroying someone’s life. I’m thinking primarily lottery winners. Just because one person successfully adjusted to it doesn’t mean it’s easy and everyone can.

Of course Musk is a special case where he ruins other people’s lives with his wealth but that’s not my point.

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The idea that 70% of lottery winners lose all their winnings isn't true. It's based on a fake statistic.

The news loves to highlight the cases where that's true because it reinforces the cultural notion that wealth is tied to morality.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/dec/21/belief-in-a-lottery-curse-is-comforting-but-winning-lots-of-money-does-make-you-happy

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah that’s one if those truthy sayings that no one really looks into.

I completely agree the point of the lie is to convince poorer people that they aren’t good enough, smart enough to handle wealth.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone knows 50%of statistics are made up.

This is 100% true half the time because the internet.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Damn that’s messed up, yo.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

This fact perfectly dismantles the idea of meritocracy, which is why the "lottery curse" lie is pushed by the wealthy. The lottery selects specifically for people who are prone to gambling and poor choices, and yet the majority do just fine with their winnings, because the truth is that wealth protects you from the consequences of your choices.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I hope Yanni is in a palace full of pups. And Rhys Fulber a temple full of snakes (I'm assuming he likes snakes).

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah if I found myself with more money than I know what to do with I'd spend my time and energy volunteering and working on projects and spending lots of time with friends.

Hell, imagine if these losers went carnagie and started building libraries instead of trying to get them banned. Or maybe something bold like the "Elon Musk bullet train". They could st least try to be loved instead of whatever they're doing now.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read a "fuck ton of titties" and got a little confused

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Welp, I have a new goal in life.