this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
403 points (97.6% liked)

News

35724 readers
2570 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

New FBI Director Kash Patel, a Trump ally with no FBI experience, has made unusual security requests, showing distrust of his own agency.

He asked for a private security detail instead of FBI protection and sought a direct secure line to the Oval Office, bypassing the attorney general.

FBI directors since J. Edgar Hoover have maintained independence from the White House, but Patel is closely aligned with Trump.

Known for promoting conspiracy theories, he has also been accused of leading an FBI purge.

The FBI dismissed reports on his requests as "false leaks or distractions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 84 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

and sought a direct secure line to the Oval Office, bypassing the attorney general.

FBI directors since J. Edgar Hoover have maintained independence from the White House, but Patel is closely aligned with Trump.

Congress should really codify that into law, instead of it just being a "Gentleman's/society Agreement".

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Add it to the list of things we need to codify. Like the president releasing his tax returns.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yep. I know its a rule (that is being ignored), but it isn't actually a law?

Wonder why we bother with rules, if nobody is ever going to enforce them, especially when we vote into office those who don't care to follow them.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You could say the same about laws, considering how no one is enforcing them against the current administration.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

The problem is that the Executive Branch is the one that enforces laws, and they have the authority to ignore laws they don't want to enforce. Discretion is a fundamental part of law enforcement, it is why you can get a warning for speeding instead of a ticket every time, their discretion ability wasn't codified. That is why generally federal law enforcement like the FBI operates independently even though they're under the Executive, so they can enforce laws and judicial decisions without interference. Interfering should trigger check and balances from the Legislative branch, and impeachment.

The system was never designed with the possibility of a takeover of all three branches simultaneously as a possibility. That just wasn't a thing they thought was likely to happen. But the system was also designed at a time when only white landowners could vote, and part of their societal expectation was to be educated, critical thinkers that were up to date, and active with politics. So those voting actually knew what was going on, and were educated to look at the various outcomes, even with media bias of the time.

As we've expanded voting rights, we never adjusted the system to account for uneducated voters or an increase in propaganda and outright lying from media outlets in any way. On top of that we've artificially limited the expansion of the House of Representatives so it no longer operates as designed. It was designed to represent the people via population, but the limit of 435 means that instead of it being representative of population, there are members representing a couple hundred thousand people and members representing millions, yet they have the same single vote. The House has become a pseudo-Senate, and is no longer capable of doing its job correctly because of it.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

They are to subvert the working class and keep them in line

[–] nicky7@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Somehow I don't think that would have mattered with these traitors.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Normally I would have disagreed with you, but these days, 🤷‍♂️ .

At least, it would have made it where they would be on the record officially about it, for history's sake.

And it would give others a chance/ammunition at pushing back, in the courts.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] nicky7@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just for the record, I do agree with you that these should have been codified by Congress.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Congress is irrelevant now. We're in a soft dictatorship now.