this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
164 points (95.6% liked)

Firefox

19343 readers
127 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was initially against DRM support, but in hindsight I believe FF would have quickly slipped into irrelevance without it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, with standards you have to pick your battles like that. It would have been perceived badly, and anything else Firefox would have wanted to do would have been shot down with that used as the example. A good stake in the ground they made was with manifest v3 and not arbitrarily trying to stop ad blockers, and they had the power to do that, granted less of a standard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. DRM is up to the user, whereas Manifest v3... isn't.