this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
1553 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

14079 readers
2761 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1553
nets (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
181 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

have you tried that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It seems to be working well after about 6 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

seems like this comic indicates it's not doing enough

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems the problem is beyond finding a 'cure-all'. Multiple strategies will be necessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd prefer an effective strategy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

..which somehow doesn't include producing less garbage?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

less garbage isn't created regardless of whether you or I buy fish

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

An individual abstaining from owning slaves didn't reduce slave populations either. Think they were as dumb and ineffectual as I am? Fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

so you are moving the goalposts from efficacy to ethics. that's fine, but I don't believe eating fish is unethical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Multitudes of alternatives (plants!) are less cruel and harmful to our planet. Do you disagree?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think eating fish is cruel, nor inherently harmful to the planet. the methods of fishing that have developed, and the scale of modern fishing are problems, but for me to choose to abstain from fish would not mitigate the situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is anything cruel?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

say what you want to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How is inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering not cruel?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

say what you want to say