this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
286 points (99.3% liked)
Denver
1223 readers
6 users here now
A place for discussions about Denver, CO.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the US is about to re-test the limits of federalism.
The more separate each state is from such an overpowered executive branch, the better. Under more normal circumstances I'm very anti "states rights", but there's too much unchecked power in one place now.
Notice how the GOP stopped removed about states rights the moment they won everything? It was never about states rights. It was about hoarding power and unchecked authoritarianism.
Or have many states de-federate from that instance, like what happened to hexbear
Can't legally secede due to White v Texas
I getcha, but I think it's gotten to the point where legality is teetering out the window
Secession is still a minority movement all things considered. Yes California went nowhere. It would be an action in the leadup of a complete collapse, so constitutional crisis or not, there may not be a US Government to effectively enforce it.
Chief Justice Chase said at the time of White v Texas that a revolution by a state couldn't be stopped by White v Texas. Scalia's remarks on this (Paywall) never addressed revolution, only that a state can't secede by law.