this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
379 points (98.0% liked)

News

36118 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shininghero@pawb.social 171 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Repeat after me: DOGE is not an official government agency. The senate has not voted on approving its creation.
Until such time, DOGE is nothing more than a domestic hacking group fraudulently impersonating federal authorities.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I completely agree with you. But what are you going to do about it? Judge them? Who's going to be the judge?

I'm starting to think that if america wants to get rid of these nazis, they are going to need to do the only thing you can do to get rid of nazis. And it's not democratic nor polite.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

You can't vote out fascism.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, maybe one of the people employed as a judge?

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

I said it before, DOGE is a group of terrorists led by an foreign national.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Didn't they just rename an existing agency? Nonetheless they need to be stopped.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. It's completely outside the normal government system.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, they renamed a committee responsible for streamlining IT services for the executive branch. As such, they do not have any of the authority they claim.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really, which one? This would be the first I've heard of it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

You're right, but none of the government is treating them as such.