this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
805 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued a memo prioritizing federal funding for communities with marriage and birth rates above the national average.

The directive, which applies to grants, loans, and contracts, also prioritizes projects benefiting families with young children.

A congressional aide criticized the policy, saying, “Considering fertility rates when prioritizing federal grants? We obviously have no idea what the full impact of that will be… It’s absolutely creepy. It’s a little ‘Chinese government.’”

The memo also blocks mask mandates and requires compliance with immigration enforcement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For all those asking, the Facebook link didn't even work for me, so I just searched and there looks to be an active r/50501 group.

It doesn't seem like an organized thing, just be at your state capital. Here's a few posters from the reddit:

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't know anything either. I just got overly pissed this morning because they removed Transgender from all government websites. Like dude, that's us! Who's next? Who will protest when there's no one left to speak up?

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

They are really going full speed on the destruction of near everything. I thought it would be more methodical, but it seems scorched earth is what they're going for.

My heart goes out to you, it seems like trans rights were just starting to catch on and now it feels like you're in more danger than ever. But none of us that do support you did so just because the gov told us it was ok now, so we won't stop just because of crap like this. Millions are still on your side.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

why the hell do they plan these during the week, DURING the work day?? Saturday would be too convenient??

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure if the work distribution is part of the point or not. The protests would have to be huge though for that to make a dent I'd think though.

Part of what these protests are against is the removal of protections for employees, so having people risk employment during this time does seem a bit problematic.

I really don't know what we're supposed to do anymore, especially living in a time with surveillance everywhere. I'm just volunteering in my community and letting people know I'm on their side should they need me.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I had the same thought. States are huge, too, so state capitols are going to be a healthy drive for a lot of folks. Short notice, far off location (I mean, take Cali; San Francisco and LA are NOT close to Sac), and middle of the workday/school day timing. If you were planning a fake protest to show how little enthusiasm there is to push back against Trump, it'd be hard to do better than this.