this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
566 points (94.4% liked)

Selfhosted

54792 readers
191 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was common in budget laptops 10 years ago. I had a Asus laptop with the same resolution and I have seen others with this resolution as well

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago

Here in Brazil, there are still a lot of laptops, monitors and tvs being sold with that resolution.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a whole 86x48 more than 1280x720!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

😆nice

I just learned that this resolution resulted from 4:3 screens which got some wideness added to reach 16:9 from an awesome person in this comment thread 😊

I had to check the post not logged in, weirdly I only see your comment when I'm logged in, but yeah, I (almost) only ever ssh into it, so I never really noticed the resolution until you pointed it out

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Which doesn't sound like much, but if you have applications designed for 1024x768 (which was pretty much the standard PC resolution for years) then at least it would fit on the screen.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some old netbook I guess, or unsupported hardware and a driver default. If all you need is ssh, the display resolution hardly matters.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, just never saw this numbers for resolution, ever 😆

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most 720p TVs ("HD Ready") used to be that resolution since they re-used production lines from 1024x768 displays

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Ahh, I see, they took the 4:3 Standard screen and let it grow to 16:9, that makes a lot of sense 😃

I am to young for knowing 4:3 resolutions 😆