Sentau

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It was interesting to see Novak hitting harder and flatter during the tournament. Clearly a tactical change he has made because he can no longer outgrind carlito or sinner. It did work to an extent as he was able to defeat sinner (which i was not expecting) and also he made a good fist of it in the final. Then again, without musetti's injury, who knows how things would have played out.

Crazy that Alcaraz has already completed the career slam. If sinner and Carlos maintain this level till their mid 30's, several records are under threat though it is still unknown if they will have the kind of longetivity that pushed the big 3 to greatness.

Onto the next tournament I guess.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't musetti is a small player anymore. He is in the top 8. Also novak's next match is against jannik and surely we can't categorise him as small :)

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No I mean why do you want novak to lose?

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Why the 2nd part¿?

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In a hub motor, the torque is measured at the wheel (since the motor is directly attached to the wheel). In ICE motorcycles, the torque figure mentioned is engine torque so to get the wheel torque, we have to multiply by the gear ratio, drive ratio, etc. In terms of actual wheel torque, I don't expect much difference between this and desmosedici bikes from Ducati. Just that with the electrical motor, you can apply the full torque instantly

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think these people are making the battery. Battery manufacturers are still the ones manufacturing the batteries. Verge will buy from them and integrate it into the bike. The reason I guess other automobile and battery companies have not yet started to do it is because SSB tech is not ready for mass production in a financial viable way. A niche 40k euro bike doesn't have such cost constraints.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Isn't that armour a blood raven¿?

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Bruh that's true for the entire season now.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Man I can't wait for Charles to leave Ferrari and go to a competitive team

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

That was a slick goal

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

That is one tiny kitten

 

Removed: firefox-136.0.1-1.fc41.x86_64 firefox-langpacks-136.0.1-1.fc41.x86_64 freerdp-libs-2:3.12.0-1.fc41.x86_64 gnome-bluetooth-1:47.1-1.fc41.x86_64 gnome-browser-connector-42.1-8.fc41.x86_64 gnome-classic-session-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gnome-initial-setup-47.2-1.fc41.x86_64 gnome-remote-desktop-47.3-1.fc41.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gnome-shell-extension-background-logo-47.0-1.fc41.noarch gnome-shell-extension-common-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gnome-shell-extension-launch-new-instance-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gnome-shell-extension-places-menu-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gnome-shell-extension-window-list-47.4-2.fc41.noarch gstreamer1-plugin-libav-1.24.11-1.fc41.x86_64 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.11-1.fc41.x86_64 pipewire-utils-1.2.7-7.fc41.x86_64 uresourced-0.5.4-2.fc41.x86_64

The latest build of u-blue:main has removed these packages. Is anybody also experiencing this? I could find no information regarding this on the discourse forum.

Edit : the issue has been resolved in the next build image. It was a small error that crowd in due to shifting to dnf5. Thanks for to maintainers for doing all the hardwark

 

Took a long time to clean. They were pretty filthy since they were neglected for quite sometime.

19
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I recently had to show a presentation at a client's location and they were using a Benq smartboard. I tried to connect to the monitor with my laptop running uBlue:main but while the monitor would detect that something has been plugged into it and switch to the HDMI input, my laptop refused to detect that it was connected to anything. Fortunately, I had backed up the presentation on an external drive so we connected my colleague's windows laptop and gave the presentation.

Now what I am curious about is why my laptop would not detect the smartboard as a video output. Do display outs have to be added to some kind whitelist? If I wanted to file a bug report for the same, where should the report be filed? In the kernel development, in the mesa project or somewhere else?

System specs :-

  • Ryzen 5 5600H + Radeon RX5500M

  • HDMI 2.1 port on the laptop

  • Fedora Silverblue - uBlue:main

  • Kernel version 6.11.10 (at the time)

  • Mesa version 24.2.x (don't exactly know which version was running at the time i think it was 24.2.8)

 
 

This is the kind of stuff dreams are made of. The fact that his late father was a keeper just makes the story so much more special.

 

So I have been listening to the radio surrounding the aborted start. McLaren fucked up with both cars and asked them to pull away. Same with Mercedes, VCARB and Haas. Alpine gave the correct instructions to wait and switch off and followed the rules to the T but then were forced to go because the others in front went. Same as Alpine for all the remaining teams (Red Bull, Ferrari, Aston, Williams and Sauber).

Frankly the McLarens, Mercs, VCARBs and Haases should be penalized.

 

So I saw that the rpm-ostreed-automatic.service was failing so I manually tried to upgrade but when i run rpm-ostree upgrade, I am getting an error Creating importer: Failed to invoke skopeo proxy method OpenImage: remote error: A signature was required, but no signature exists. Is this some error at my side or is this some key related issue at uBlue's side?

 

I recently made a post about my FreeSync certified monitor not supporting VRR over HDMI. I thought that there was VRR support over HDMI even for versions below 2.1 spec. Am I mistaken in my assumption¿? Has the HDMI forum prevented the implementation of FreeSync in the open source drivers¿?

Obligatory fuck the HDMI forum and the HDMI spec.

 

I have a AMD CPU + AMD dGPU laptop and recently bought a LG FreeSync monitor. I hooked up the monitor to my laptop and got it working mostly fine but I dont get any option to set VRR on my LG monitor.

I am on Gnome and have enabled VRR through gsettings. My laptop display shows the option to toggle VRR (and is currently being used with VRR on) but my LG display does not. The Archwiki says that the option to toggle VRR should show up on every supported display. I have verified from the user manual that FreeSync is supported over both HDMI and DP and from the monitors menu, I have verified that FreeSync is enabled. Is this a bug or I am missing something.

Hardware and Software

  • Ryzen 5 5600H with Vega integrated graphics
  • Radeon RX 5500M
  • Internal Display of 1080p, 144Hz (I have no idea which panel it is)
  • LG 24GS60F-B monitor connected over HDMI 2.0
  • uBlue main 40 (Fedora Silverblue 40)
  • GNOME 46.4
  • Kernel version 6.10.3
  • Mesa 24.1.5

Thanks in advance for the help.

 

So there are these two monitors - Samsung Odyssey G3 LS24AG32 and LS24AG30. Both of them are practically the same but the LS24AG32 is 165Hz and the LS24AG30 is 144Hz. Since they are both VA panels, I was worried about severe ghosting. All the reviews I find are for LS24AG30 which has what I find is an acceptable level of ghosting but I the only model available on my region is LS24AG32 so I am wondering if it uses the same panel which would mean a similar level of ghosting. The issue is that the old model of the Odyssey G3 had terrible ghosting so I am worried about the LS24AG32. The LS24AG32 model comes with a AU optronics M238HVN02.0 CELL but I couldn't find any information for the LS24AG30. Can somebody help me. Thanks in advance

view more: next ›