this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
375 points (92.3% liked)

News

36782 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Jake Paul defeated 58-year-old Mike Tyson in an eight-round boxing match, with unanimous scores of 79-73 and 80-72.

The bout, widely criticized as a “stunted show,” highlighted Tyson’s physical decline, including issues with sciatica, a stomach ulcer, and knee problems.

Tyson, once a feared heavyweight champion, struggled to compete, while Paul’s performance lacked effort and authenticity.

Fans, initially supportive of Tyson, grew disenchanted, booing by the final rounds.

Tyson dismissed the fight’s significance beforehand, rejecting the concept of legacy as meaningless. The event was seen as a cynical, contrived spectacle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

which rapist can punch more

ftfy

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll take your word for it. I've never really understood the whole idea of boxing being entertaining in the first place.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Skilled athletes are entertaining to watch. Guys that know how fight and do it well, at least. It can be a highly technical, highly skilled competition. Some people are just there to watch two adults beat the piss out of each other. Which, to be fair, is how the sport started.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. Even the match before with the girls seemed like it was an incredible fight for boxing, and it was still just as entertaining as a rock ‘em sock ‘em robot game.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back in the 70s and early 80s boxing was incredible. Ali was still a contender and Spinx, Fraser, Sugar Ray, Marvelous Marvin, Holmes and Durán lit up their weight classes like a Christmas tree.

Then Tyson entered the sphere and blew the doors off. He was fucking amazing to watch back then. His precision and power were something we'd never seen before and we were in awe.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly think UFC ruined boxing.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pre-Dana White commercialized ufc was crazy to watch. The same octagon, but with almost no rules meant busted arms, legs, etc.

I remember the first time I saw it (on video, pre-streaming days) and it was far more gruesome than boxing ever was.

I think you're right that UFC ruined boxing.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Also 20 minute or grappling with very little action followed by somebody tapping out for no reason.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, boxing ruined boxing with their ass-backwards scoring and match decision-making. Look at Mayweather vs Pacquiao, or even Taylor vs Serrano, where that latter clearly had the upper hand in their respective fights, but the decision went to the formers on technicalities and judging particulars. It's disenchanting to many spectators to see a fight where, betting aside, the majority of people view the fight as going one direction while a small minority place the outcome differently.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can understand that those things are issues, but to me, boxing is such a boring sport compared to UFC. I would watch boxing pre UFC cause it was all we had. But now it’s just boring.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can say at least I understand martial arts, even if it’s not my thing, because there’s so much artistry in that and it’s a full body thing whereas boxing is basically just too dudes punching each other. Hit me up when the fighters start using Instant Transmission and Special Beam Cannon and I’ll give it another look

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

(note - I'm a relative noob for boxing. I attend semi regular classes at a local gym but don't tend to watch much at all)

Boxing requires a huge depth of skill and not a huge breadth. It's one of those sports where the basics are 99% of the sport. Definitely makes it seem like 2 dudes just going at each other, but the amount of skill and raw stamina needed to be remotely competitive is insane. Even with gloves, those punches still hurt like a mother fucker and then you're expected to not only keep going after receiving a few dozen, but expected to dish out your own

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, martial arts makes sense to me. Even (real) wrestling makes sense to me.

I'm sure boxing actually does require a lot of skill, but it just looks like two guys punching each other to me.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which rapist can haphazardly throw an occasional swing in the vague direction of their opponent, at least half the time at least being close enough to theoretically connect.

Ftfy.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For millions of dollars.