this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
16 points (83.3% liked)
SpaceX
2777 readers
6 users here now
Rules:
- Posts and discussion must be related to SpaceX.
- Community focus is on the company, not its CEO.
- Currently experimenting with the moderation policy for niche communities. If you think you have been banned in error, please reach out.
Related space communities:
- !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@mander.xyz
Memes:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So exactly like the Spaceshuttle? I doubt that will be economic in most cases even if Starship launches are significantly cheaper.
I think the more likely outcome will be much cheaper sattelites made with heavier standard components and with more fuel on board to deorbit or stabilize them if something goes wrong.
If they can get the starship reusability close to that of the falcon 9, nevermind what they are aiming for, it will work. The problem with the space shuttle was how hard it was to reuse it.