this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
359 points (97.1% liked)

Curated Tumblr

6932 readers
24 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Implied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

7th implication: Religion is genetic

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actual Implication: You're supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.

Unimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents') denomination.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, Jewish boys go through a ritual to mark them as part of the religion and christening occurs early too, so I would say that religious people usually assume the baby's religion.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Non-jewish boys often go through the same ritual, even in a jew-hating religion, because of "tradition".

Not in my country. But my point still stands as long as there is religious significance to the ritual for some.