this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
1421 points (99.7% liked)

Curated Tumblr

7558 readers
10 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The premise still fails, it assumes teenagers are rational actors.

Are you really going to state that your Axiom is teenagers weigh risks and benefits from all available information?

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m confused. What I’m saying is that without looking at data I could totally see someone imagining a teenager saying “oh, cool, I don’t have to worry about having a kid if I just use a condom” then having more sex because of that. And if I could imagine that for one teen, then I could imagine it for many. That doesn’t seem to be the case though based on the link I shared.

Are you saying teenagers are incapable of weighing pros and cons? Because that wouldn’t make sense. That’s exactly what they’re doing when they play CoD(teens still play that, right?) and decide using a shotgun is the best choice on the Cargo map. Just because their reasoning is less developed doesn’t mean it’s not there.

don’t have to worry about having a kid

No. The current situation is they

don’t worry about having a kid

Adding info doesn't change the fact that they are not considering consequences, or value the consequences so low vs the immediate result.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It also assumes that people are dumber than the stupidest of animals. Who taught all of them to have sex? And some of them go at it like rabbits!

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090206081312.htm

teenagers consider the future less and prefer immediate rewards over delayed ones

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not disputing anything you said, I'm just adding on that "well, if they just don't know what sex is" is a demonstrably false presumption. And sure, teenagers tend to not worry about the future as much, which only means that planning works better. If they might have sex and have condoms they will be far likelihood to have sex with condoms than either not having sex because they don't have condoms or stopping in the heat of the moment to get condoms.