this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
342 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
89533 readers
2536 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only time I ever exposed my SSH port to the WAN, I got about 750 connection attempts from China and 250 attemps from Russia per hour.
Yet some people will still say with a straight face "tHeRe iS nO hYbRiD wAr!1!1"
Not in Ba Sing Se at least...
This was about 20 years ago btw. I know it's gotten worse. But it started earlier than most think.
Yeah, BBC has a whole documentary about it. Plus the russian state department basically published it all in a propaganda manual. They don't exactly try to hide this stuff...
New friends from all over the world!
yeah, while reading this i was going "What maniac exposes SSH to WAN anyway...?" the whole time. I fail to see any reason or point that can be justified exposing SSH to WAN.
I used to have a synology NAS that would sleep of death itself. Synology support asked me to port forward SSH to the open internet and set no password so they could pull logs over the next few weeks.
Yes, it was legit synology support not a scammer.
No, I haven’t bought synology ever again.
What do you use now? Qnap?
I build my own stuff now. I tried qnap after synology but it just sucked in different ways.
Not the person you responded to, but I'll give my unsolicited advice: I switched to Unifi NAS. QNAP has had a lot of security nightmares, and a bad habit of EOLing devices.
The best option might actually be using an old workstation and going with something like TrueNAS, but I enjoy the convenience of a purpose built box.
One big difference between Unifi NAS and something like QNAP or Synology, is that the Unifi NAS only does NAS work, it doesn't run containers or "apps". You need separate compute if you want to run containers.
One thing I didn't know before buying a UniFi Nas was it does not support raid0 or jbod unfortunately
The sounds like a big one. Doesn't affect me, but you'd think a lot of people would want one of those.
Unifi actually sounds better. I'm the same and want my NAS to be optimized by someone smarter than me. I've been using qnap and don't really care for half the crap they offer. They're not as enshittified as Synology, but they're getting there.
99.999% of that is over IPv4. I leave IPv6 open to WAN for my own use and it's not a problem.
Thanks for the intel
Yeah it's crazy. Are they just constantly pinging every possible ip address on every possible port every second? I opened a port for 1 day and the traffic made me uncomfortable enough to rearchitecture my entire self host setup