Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
view the rest of the comments
"Certainly not us!" said every politician ever.
But hey, at least we got that one trillion euro investment package for military and infrastructure spending. Which is totally not going to get misused by using it to fill gaps in the regular budget. Right?
You may have missed that there is a war ongoing in Europe, and the threat goes far beyond its current state.
You might have missed that the same party blocking any new debts while amassing a massive investement backlog and letting the military rot for decades campaigned on "no new debts!", instantly took on literally a trillion of new debt for military, economy and infrastructure investments the moment they won... and then managed to actually even reduce the investements into infrastructure compared to their (because of them) cash-strapped predecessors while all spending on "the economy" was gifts and tax breaks for their rich buddies that do exactly nothing for the economy. Oh, and of course they started demolitioning social systems because somehow, magically they have no money...
So just fuck off with that "but there is a war!" screaming they constantly use to divert from their obvious corruption. That we can only spend money on the military when we fuck the people is already a fairy tale in the first place. There is enough money if we finally starting taxing people properly. Instead they just funnel off hundreds of billions in debt to their mostly untaxed donors, then start raising taxes on workers and reducing social spending because they need money for the military and the money dedicated exactly for this magically vanished (and we all know where it ended up).
Why do idiots always need to copy any insanity from the US where they are also brain-washing people into thinking that military spending is the reason they can't afford health care or stuff, while much of that "military spending" is just hidden industry subsidies and corrupt waste and they also actually spend massive amounts in healthcare... it's just bad by design to make the rich even richer.
@Ooops@feddit.org
Thank you for your polite comment.
Thank you for βjust accidently of courseβ getting rid of all the "...with the screaming they constantly use to divert from their corruption"-context.
What an interesting coincidence that people parroting populist talking points always use the exact same populist tactics.
Yeah, tankies are just parroting the same propaganda, and they are indeed using the same phrases.
How exactly do you think these two statements are connected?
You may have misses the various studies conducted on the inefficient spending of said budgets.
The problem ist, that especially with the background of this already ongoing war, deindustrialisation is the worst one could do. Because this deindustrialisation creates a dependence on powers that cannot be trusted.
I agree this is the case for defense industry including industries the defense industry needs. But the rest? Why does Germany need such a big car industry in a world where China has learned to build cars (even better ones) themselves (and it was absolutely foreseeable that this would happen) and the US goes full protectionism (ok this one was less foreseeable)? Trying to keep that alive is a waste of resources.
It is not a waste of resources to produce things locally. Transporting everything, including trivial industrial goods half way around the World is a massive waste of resources, and is highly vulnerable to accident (see Ever Given being stuck sideways in the Suez Canal), natural disasters (see CoVID leading to the closure of most Chinese sea ports), conflict (see current events in the Middle East), and shifting alliances. Especially with a virtual monopoly on outsourced industrial production, China has acquired a position where it can blackmail pretty much the entire World by simply enacting an embargo.
I didn't say Germany should not have a car industry at all. I said the size the car industry Germany currently has should not be artificially kept up. Of course cars bought in Germany/Europe should be produced in Germany/Europe.
The whole "Exportweltmeister" (export world champion, a term proudly used by Germans for a while) thing was never sustainable. Unfortunately voters think its the Greens/Energy transitions/whatever fault the whole thing comes crashing down now.
(That being said, cars are a waste of resources wherever they are built)
The German car industry is a prime example of how greed ruins sales. The decline of their quality started in the mid 1990s, and has a name: The Lopez Effect. After the CEO of VW back then who did famously increase profits by systematically decreasing product quality, and coercing parts manufacturers into unsustainable low pricing.
On top of reducing their quality, they re-focused on the international upscale market, and raised their prices, leading to fewer domestic sales. This can only work for so long, because, even with long-lived products such as cars, after some time, even the most stupid idiot will notice that you aren't selling a product worth the price you are asking and will stop buying from you. If you sprinkle in some good old fashioned enshittification (which was pioneered by the car industry even before enshittification became a word through the computer/IT industry discovering it and some dude writing a book about the phenomenon), in order to increase profits from repairs and servicing, you will hurt your long term sales even more, because nobody wants to buy a car that spends more time in the shop than on the road and needs expensive servicing at a licensed workshop for even the most trivial maintenance and repairs, such as changing a burnt-out light bulb.
If you know cars from the early 1990s and their quality and longevity, you cannot help but seeing modern cars as nothing but overpriced piles of garbage (I don't want to say "scrap", because modern cars are more cheap plastic than metal) that can't be kept in service for any prolonged time period without unsustainable costs due to impossible repairs.
I fear it is more like a package for military and military infrastructure spending. In case you are looking for a job, Rheinmetall has them.
Even they have this "restructuring" oddly. Source: i applied and had an interview and that was their answer to me asking after a month