this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
344 points (99.1% liked)

Australia

5191 readers
69 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stigger32@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh? Why would we have it ‘live streamed’ anyway?

Besides that; All of our FTA tv channels will blur anything remotely confronting as a matter of course.

You tube is where you’ll get your jollies. And the Australian government can’t/won’t censor that…

[–] dusk@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Australian government was able to remove access to social media for under 16's to 'protect them', so why aren't they able to remove access to live streamed murder?

[–] Stigger32@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Serious question? Or trolling?

[–] dusk@piefed.social 0 points 6 days ago

Serious question? Or trolling?

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

able to remove access

No they weren’t, they just said they could. Any kid who wants to access it, especially the worst bits, still can

[–] dusk@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is hopefully a 1 time 'event', blocking access to this would have an immediate effect, the issue would be that once this is online, there will be multiple ways in future to view it, and sick f*cks who wish to do so.

A decent government would still oppose this, and would attempt to block access to it.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Definitely, no argument here and the government should be clear on it.

This is a fucking disgrace. I’m not surprised though.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Block is not the same as remove.

[–] dusk@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remove access is not the same as remove content

Being a pedant is not the same as making a valid point.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Hmmm... You know what, I don't actually know the technical means by which a government blocks something.

Do they have to contact the Internet Asigned Numbers Authority or something? Or is it done via contacting the major ISPs? Or some Australian exit point?

[–] dusk@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No idea, I was surprised that they were able to get social media to comply with their censoring the young from information bs, since Australia is such a small market.

"Livestreaming US execution would breach prohibition of torture, UN rights office warns" https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/10/1168565

Every nation should be doing whatever they can to block access to this, and should also be opposing the usa's choice to be even sicker f*cks than they normally are.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The Social Media ban was apparently funded by Murdoch, because social media sites aggregate news and steal clicks from him, and so he wants to limit their reach.

That plus I imagine we're a signatory to international courts, so could technically sue Facebook and what not. That plus Murdoch funding = massive change.

...and Murdoch went easy on Labor come election time in exchange. So it was feasible for all involved. Unfortunately.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were able to geoblock the 2024 attempted stabbing of the orthodox protest, but I don't think they were able to get it taken down. Pretty sure that the Christchurch massacre was taken down though

[–] Stigger32@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Both were after the fact though. Which I am sure they will have the court orders ready to go. But the livestream is another story.

Either way. It will be interesting to see what happens.