this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
344 points (99.1% liked)

Australia

5191 readers
75 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Block is not the same as remove.

[–] dusk@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remove access is not the same as remove content

Being a pedant is not the same as making a valid point.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hmmm... You know what, I don't actually know the technical means by which a government blocks something.

Do they have to contact the Internet Asigned Numbers Authority or something? Or is it done via contacting the major ISPs? Or some Australian exit point?

[–] dusk@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No idea, I was surprised that they were able to get social media to comply with their censoring the young from information bs, since Australia is such a small market.

"Livestreaming US execution would breach prohibition of torture, UN rights office warns" https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/10/1168565

Every nation should be doing whatever they can to block access to this, and should also be opposing the usa's choice to be even sicker f*cks than they normally are.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Social Media ban was apparently funded by Murdoch, because social media sites aggregate news and steal clicks from him, and so he wants to limit their reach.

That plus I imagine we're a signatory to international courts, so could technically sue Facebook and what not. That plus Murdoch funding = massive change.

...and Murdoch went easy on Labor come election time in exchange. So it was feasible for all involved. Unfortunately.