Not The Onion

22702 readers

84 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

179

Our Solar System Is Terminally Unstable and Will Be Completely Destroyed, Study Finds (www.404media.co)

submitted 1 week ago by heliotrope@slrpnk.net to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LordXDnl@literature.cafe 205 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean when you make it as arbitrary as possible. The universe is terminally unstable and will be completely destroyed. Bit of a nonsensical headline without timelines.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (3 children)

FTA:

The estimated lifespan of the outer solar system has been downgraded from 100 billion years to just a few billion years, according to a study that probed “terminal instability” during the Sun’s death.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 29 points 1 week ago

FTA:

“Newton’s envisioned instability is real after all,” the team. “He was mistaken only about the perpetrator.”

The news isn't that the solar system will eventually collapse (the concept of entropy isn't new) but that the mass loss is not predictable and smooth and the impact of the irregular mass loss fucks with their orbit:

The recently measured white dwarf recoil demands asymmetric mass loss that is most readily attributed to discrete, independently directed ejections that impulsively perturb stellar motion.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People are acting like it's not a problem, but if we have just one more downgrade of that magnitude, we'll be in big trouble

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is that going to take longer than 30 years?

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nope. One more downgrade like that and the collapse of the solar system will be 88 billion years in the past. It'll collapse before it even formed, and none of this mess will have happened in the first place. Come to think of it, that doesn't sound so bad. Since it precedes the big bang, that might help with damage limitation.

[–] madmantis24@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 week ago

I can get behind Accelerationism if it means we cause an integer overflow

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Fuck. We have a lot less time than we thought.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bit of a nonsensical headline if you refuse to read the article smh by head

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago

If an article's title doesn't make sense until after you read the article, then the title is meant to ensnare rather than inform. Aka click bait.