this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
1298 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

16787 readers
271 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] syreus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

China seems to have figured it out in their mountainous regions. Some of the lines are 90% tunnel+raised rails. And as an American we should talk about how China is roughly the same size as America. The excuse well has run dry.

[–] whatstatersprecious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I’m all for high speed rail in the US, but comparing the land area of the two countries is not really that relevant.

China’s network is really focused on about a third of the land area. US could do the same, but the big population hubs are separated and on opposite sides of the country, so it’s less ideal - lot of track to connect the two. It’s like 2-3x the distance to connect LA/NYC vs Chongqing/Shanghai.

China also has 4x the population of the US. So the cost/benefit to build this out is simply much more favorable for china.

Most importantly, China’s autocratic government can clear the red tape to get big projects like this done. Just getting the land rights to build the right track could kill a transcontinental project in the US. But that decision is consolidated in the Chinese government. This cuts time and cost immensely.

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

None of these points are strong enough to stop the idea of high speed rail in the US. The auto lobby alone does that.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But that's a non issue. If you want to get from LA to NYC, you fly. If you want to get from Chicago to NYC or from LA to San Francisco, you take the HSR... I mean you would if the US had a fully developed transport infrastructure.

[–] whatstatersprecious@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean sure but it’s the same issue, smaller scale at that point. You slashed the distance, but also the demand.

The big problem is always going to be getting the land anyway

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The corridors I mentioned are perfectly fine HSR corridors, the population numbers and distances are great for HSR, perfectly suitable. That is absolutely not the propblem. Developed countries would have already HSR along those corridors, heavily used HSR, that is transformative for the places along it.

The problem is not getting the land, the problem is politics and legislation that is hostile to it and as a consequence it is nigh impossible to get that land for critical infrastructure like that (hostile legislation is also the reason why multiple the times of construction costs have to be paid for non-construction expenses, not even counting land acquisition). Curiously enough it is not impossible to ever widen highways or even build entirely new ones.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cool cool

Then build a HSR on the east coast and one on the west coast. How about we start with that first?

Then you can worry about the detail that isn’t even that important. Nobody is saying to build HSR coast to coast

Next you are going to tell me it’s not a good solution because of Hawai