this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
1267 points (98.4% liked)

Work Reform

17812 readers
1830 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The last option you are describing is a CEO. The employee who among the officers, charged by the board to execute their decisions, is chief among them. That's what makes them a CEO. Their mandate, authority and wages are decided by the board. And in the companies where the workers have a controlling majority, the CEO is unlikely to have either absolute majority nor an disproportional wage.

You have described how a workplace owned and managed by the workers can be compatible with the role of a chief executive officer.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, I guess by technical definition. But popularly, if you describe a role that has no power except to communicate decisions of the board and who is not paid excessively, most people are not going to think “CEO.”