this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
640 points (99.4% liked)

News

40060 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kacey Musgraves is facing backlash from some fans after she showed support for immigrant families during a birthday performance.

The Grammy-winning country singer celebrated her 38th birthday on Friday by marking the opening night of her Middle of Nowhere tour in Chicago. At one point during the performance, she paused the show and urged the audience to donate to the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights as her “birthday wish.”

“It’s a wonderful organization, and they help give aid — legal aid — and money to children whose parents have been deported unfairly,” Musgraves said on stage. “It’s not a political thing. It’s just, these kids need help.”

She continued: “They have no guidance and no way to get through this thing without their home base or their parents. So anyway, 50 cents, whatever the hell, I don't know, whatever you want to do, but that would mean a lot to me. If you don't want to, that's totally fine too.”

The plea was met with applause and cheers from her crowd at the United Center. However, once videos of the moment started circulating online, conservative political commentators were quick to unleash their wrath on the “Follow Your Arrow” singer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 179 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"Otherizing" fellow human beings is like a basic tenant of facisim. As soon as you feel that all people deserve basic happiness the right will attack you.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Humans are animals forced to fight for every scrap of dignity from a horde of fellow creatures with the bodies of men and the souls of insects. The idea that you have anything besides flesh and blood in common with the zombie MAGAts overrunning this planet is dangerously naive.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

hey hey! insect souls are still warm and nurturing in comparison

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The idea that you have anything besides flesh and blood in common with the zombie MAGAts overrunning this planet is dangerously naive.

This is exactly the kind of othering he was just fucking talking about! Like seriously, do you hear yourself? It's literally dehumanizing language. You can't fight bigotry by out-bigoting everyone else.

Anyway, I don't want to see it in my communities, it's deeply unhelpful.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Nazis are evil. I will die on this hill.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

Nazis are evil, by definition of their basic ideology being evil.

That still doesn't change that they are 100 % human. They aren't some kind of monsters that need eradication. They are humans, which need to be stopped by lethal force if necessary from enacting their plans to eradicate others. But they are and always will be part of humanity, even if a very evil part, that the rest of us doesn't want to be compared to.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm right there with you. However, even Nazis are human.

In fact, especially Nazis are human; it takes a human to be that evil. But don't pretend they're anything less than typical, this is why you have to engage with them, you can't write them off worthless scum and pretend they don't exist or matter, there's too many of them for that. The only way to beat them is to absorb them back into reasonable society. It's a shitload of work, and you just have to keep at it until their ideologies are once again a fringe subculture.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They’re human, sure, and all humans are animals. Of course, not all animals are people.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And it sounds like you're one of them. But here I am engaging with you. Trying to remind you that you can be better, that you can be the bigger person, that you have a responsibility to be change you want to see.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Personhood is the instantiation of certain transcendental values. Many (if not most) humans in our 200k year history have not been people capable of understanding important things or acting in moral ways. So what? Bears aren’t people either and it doesn’t stop me from being nice to them. Pretending otherwise out of some misplaced sense of inclusivity doesn’t make me a “better” person, as you said — it makes me wrong.

——

By the way, the argument you’re making is a speciesist one, as if all Homo sapiens share a special trait that other animals don’t and denying this fact is “dehumanizing,” whatever that means.

This is incorrect. All animals, including humans, fall somewhere on a spectrum: for kindness, for intelligence, for their ability to love, etc. Some combination of these traits is called “personhood” and grants you special responsibilities and considerations — for example, my willingness to take your ethical opinions seriously, as I’m doing now, for you.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the definition of dehumanization.

Imo I can hold the tenets that fascists must be met with force as violence is the only thing that will stop them (the Keyser Söse theorem); but that doesn't stop me from considering them as human beings, who weren't born this way. It may be tactically correct to consider the reasons someone would turn to naziism and fight those as well.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

What part of “Nazis are human” is dehumanizing?

I’m not sure what has to malfunction in the brain or soul of any animal (human or otherwise) to become a Nazi, but it robs them of personhood, which is why they’re dangerous. There are dolphins, elephants, and other animals that I’d consider akin to people, and some humans I wouldn’t.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This part:

not all humans are people

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Personhood is not the right to moral consideration. That is a right of all sentient creatures. So what is it? Have you ever read anything about this before or are you just now discovering the concept?

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dehumanization is the process, practice, or act of denying full humanity in others,^[1]^ along with the cruelty and suffering that accompany it.^[2][3][4]^ It involves perceiving individuals or groups as lacking essential human qualities, such as secondary emotions and mental capacities, thereby placing them outside the bounds of moral concern.^[1]^ In this definition, any act or thought that regards a person as either "other than" or "less than" human constitutes dehumanization.^[5][6]^

In his report on the suppression of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, Jürgen Stroop described Jews resisting deportation to Nazi camps as "bandits".

Lynndie England pulling a leash attached to the neck of a prisoner in Abu Ghraib prison, who is forced to crawl on the floor, while Megan Ambuhl watches, 2003.

Dehumanization can be overt or subtle,^[7]^ and typically manifests in two primary forms: animalistic dehumanization, which denies uniquely human traits like civility, culture, or rationality and likens others to animals;^[3]^ and mechanistic dehumanization, which denies traits of human nature such as warmth, emotion, and individuality, portraying others as objects or machines.^[3]^

It has historically facilitated a broad range of harms, from discrimination and social exclusion to slavery,^[1]^ colonization,^[8]^ as well as other crimes against humanity,^[1]^ and is recognized as a significant form of incitement to genocide.^[9]^

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dehumanization is a concern when some humans believe that moral consideration is grounded in humanity. It is not. Every sentient creature is worthy of moral consideration, even nazis.

If you are one of these humans who believe that your species (as opposed to your sentience) grants you inalienable rights, then yes, I can see why dehumanization would concern you.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your speciecist definition of “person” — whereby every human is automatically entitled to personhood (even Nazis), whereas every elephant or dog is denied personhood (even good ones) — seems grossly out of touch with normative and empirical reality.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think i deny dogs and elephants personhood?

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because what made you upset was the denial that “all humans are persons.” Since you had no problem with the claim that “not all animals are persons,” you must believe there’s something special about Homo sapiens.

Here, look:

  • Is a a good dog a person? Yes.
  • What about a rabid dog? No.

Likewise,

  • Is a good human a person? Yes.
  • What about a nazi? No.
  • What about a zombie? Also, no.

But this conclusion is unacceptable to you. It’s almost as if the “species” matters. I am attempting to disabuse you of that belief.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

All human life has value, but people who disagree lose the protection implied by that statement.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago

With "Liberty and Justice for all" sprawled across their back windshield.