this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Satisfactory

2078 readers
1 users here now

The unofficial Lemmy community for Satisfactory, the factory-building and exploration game.

Useful Links:

Similar Communities !automationgames@lemmy.zip

Looking for Group?

@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz started a dedicated server and welcomes Fediverse users, find out more by DMing them or joining this steam chat

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content
  4. No ads/spamming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(But it's also heavily on sale right now, for $15 - https://store.steampowered.com/app/526870/Satisfactory/)

Personally, I don't mind at all. For one I bought it at $30, but also I have 2,000 hours logged. Per hour that's a cost of $0.02 per hour (at the new price) if I had bought it at $40. I'm all for calling out studios like ubisoft for being greedy, but coffee stain has done a very fair job with Satisfactory IMO, and they very well deserve $10 more for the game.

That being said, go pick it up now for $15

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inflation applies to games that are actively being developed for sure. Games don't program themselves. You need people to do it. Those people need wages to pay rent/food/utilities. If the prices of those things go up they'll need higher wages which will usually come from higher prices on the game that in this case, they continuously develop.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, no it doesn’t. The cost of a game getting patches and updates isn’t the same as the cost of making the game in the first place.

Inflation affects physical goods because you need to make the product from the ground up every single time. And those materials cost money, and rise with inflation, so making the product from scratch each time gradually costs more as time goes on. Hence why they need to raise the price of the finished product - otherwise they'd literally lose money on each sale.

Digital goods don’t work this way, once the product has been made it can freely be distributed without having to be remade again and again.

Yes, it costs money to patch and update. But that’s not comparable to rebuilding the product from the ground up like with physical goods.

By your logic all movies, tv shows, and all other forms of digital goods should actually increase price with age, not decrease. Team Fortress 2 should be like $100 by now. After all, servers aren’t free.

Also, their wages come from sales. If they no longer have money to pay their employees then they should look towards developing new games, dlc, or merchandising. Artificially inflating the prices of existing goods isn’t the answer. There’s a reason that not even EA or Activision have pulled this.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not only material costs go up with inflation.

Those materials have a price because you need labor to obtain them. The cost of everything is driven by the price of labor. The price of labor goes up with inflation.

There is no product that is unaffected by inflation.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you’re saying that because of that, all things must also rise in price, just inherently?

By your logic any movie released decades ago should cost far more now than it did back then, right? To rent or buy, it should be infinitely more. What about games from the 90’s or 00’s? They should be far more expensive.

Why don’t I have to pay 100’s of dollars every time I watch A Clockwork Orange? Why doesn’t it cost hundreds of dollars to play the original Half-Life? After all, counting for inflation they should all cost far, far more than they currently do. Actually take a second and think about it.

Why do you think buying a digital copy of something is cheaper than buying a brand new, physical copy? Because each physical copy had to be built from the ground up, taking all new materials to do so, whereas the digital copies can effectively be infinitely reproduced. They’re not affected in the same way.