482
USA Today has published a database of license plates that have been searched with Flock
(data.usatoday.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
482 points (99.8% liked)
politics
30968 readers
1479 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Holy shit one officer in my town has 309 searches on one plate.
He(?) has the top number of searches in total, and (practically) the only person to search for the top four plates in my town. The rest have like 1-2 searches from other officers in the same or adjacent town.
Wtf is so special about these 4 plates?
We only have two cameras in my town (afaik), and they are on the highway on ramps.
Is he like the desk guy the others call to have him check plates? Only somewhat reasonable explanation I can think of. Not that there's any reasonable explanation for these things to exist in the first place.
And somebody called him 309 times on the same plate?
That's once every workday for over an entire year. It's nuts. Stalker-level behavior.
I think it would be a huge breach of privacy and it shouldnt exist but the one scenario that people might argue this is fine if it was like a pariole officer.
Like if someone has conditions stating they can only go to work and such, so the officer checks to see if he was breaking his parole the day before.
Once again, I don't think it should exist... But I know a lot of people who would say that is for the betterment of society.
Sorry misread the part about it being one plate.
Ex gf or wife or a chick who turned him down. Or a trans woman he is obsessed with.
Or current wife who's he's paranoid is cheating with him. LOVEINT is fun.
It his current wife and her new boyfriend.
They really be obsessing over us
Sounds like a question for the Mayor and city council.
I contacted the police oversight committee. They report to the Governor and AG.
He’s divorced and those are his Xwife, her new boyfriend, and his two kids.
Maybe. But rolling the dice, that’s my 7.
I wouldn't bet against you, that's for sure.
Rookie numbers. This is what came from a search of my town:
What does it say when you click into name?
My city has 75% redacted and when I click on a person, the redacted account for the an even higher percentage.
The quantity of redacted makes this mostly useless.
It's 99% redacted, so not much help:
Presumably their bosses have access to this info... Like...
On the page, USA Today have a section saying if you see a plate that has a lot of searches they want to hear from you. Might be worth letting them know which plates/officer.
If they have the data, they have the ability to compile that data to find the top searched plates....... this sounds like a way of getting more interaction.
They mean if you're one of the plates being searched for a lot.
If they have the database that’s a simple query to execute against it.
Don’t tell me USA today actually reads at the level they write at? Jeez.
Seems worthy of contacting the reporter's mentioned on the site: