this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
481 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30968 readers
1713 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I now know I am OFFICIALLY on some sort of watchlist! Yippee!

The list is supposedly not exhaustive, but I recommend everyone to search your plate to see if you’ve been tracked. I worry for the safety of the women who have been searched more than 50 times by the same user.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 hours ago
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Now you only need to find a few high profile GOP members going to see young women (or men, actually…) their wives never heard of, and Flock will be severely restricted within one week.

[–] Neon_Carnivore@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The site blocks VPNs, and searching a plate might associate it with your IP address. I advise proceeding with extreme caution. I know it sounds paranoid, but given the state of things in America as of late...

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago

Oh kids.

A VPN is only really good for plausable deniability. That is there is no direct correlation between the activity coming from an ISP's IP address that is directly connected to your billing profile, home address, etc.

There are countless ways your identity can be gleaned from your digital exhaust. Fingerprinting just takes maybe four or five attributes your browser will hand over and from there, you can be reasonably identified with a high level of certainty.

For example, you might be using a Safari browser, your resolution is known (browser spills the beans to render pages), operating system, details about how your device performs a TLS (encryption) handshake, timing, any browser add-ons you might use etc.

See for yourself: https://demo.fingerprint.com/playground; there are countless pages that show you the same, this is just one.

If you think that a VPN is going to act as some sort of anonymizer, I'm afraid you've been misled. Even the act of setting up a machine/browser to be properly anonymous will generate signals which will make you stick out like a sore thumb.

VPNs are one small slice of the pie, they help but they don't solve the problem of being identified online. If you're going to do something that you REALLY don't want anyone to see, you're going to have to spend a lot of time learning--which is a signal also.

[–] perpetualflight@lemmy.zip 24 points 13 hours ago

Here is a searchable database that does work with a VPN

Have I Been Flocked

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Let's exchange plates and look up the other person's plate to confuse the system.

(I don't have a car and live in the EU)

[–] TefikiMupu@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You could just search random plate numbers

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca -5 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Oh pray tell, what is "your" IP address? Do you honestly think you have your own IP address? In the world??

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Dude, if your IP is logged with a timestamp, it's a simple matter of asking your ISP which subscriber / household was assigned that IP at the time. They don't even need a warrant.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Jesse wtf are you talking about

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Username does not check out

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago

If you have Proton, Chicago Illinois #2 works.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Holy shit one officer in my town has 309 searches on one plate.

He(?) has the top number of searches in total, and (practically) the only person to search for the top four plates in my town. The rest have like 1-2 searches from other officers in the same or adjacent town.

Wtf is so special about these 4 plates?

We only have two cameras in my town (afaik), and they are on the highway on ramps.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Is he like the desk guy the others call to have him check plates? Only somewhat reasonable explanation I can think of. Not that there's any reasonable explanation for these things to exist in the first place.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And somebody called him 309 times on the same plate?

That's once every workday for over an entire year. It's nuts. Stalker-level behavior.

I think it would be a huge breach of privacy and it shouldnt exist but the one scenario that people might argue this is fine if it was like a pariole officer.

Like if someone has conditions stating they can only go to work and such, so the officer checks to see if he was breaking his parole the day before.

Once again, I don't think it should exist... But I know a lot of people who would say that is for the betterment of society.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Sorry misread the part about it being one plate.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ex gf or wife or a chick who turned him down. Or a trans woman he is obsessed with.

[–] marzhall@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Or current wife who's he's paranoid is cheating with him. LOVEINT is fun.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

It his current wife and her new boyfriend.

[–] pega_sus@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

They really be obsessing over us

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like a question for the Mayor and city council.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago

I contacted the police oversight committee. They report to the Governor and AG.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s divorced and those are his Xwife, her new boyfriend, and his two kids.

Maybe. But rolling the dice, that’s my 7.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Rookie numbers. This is what came from a search of my town:

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What does it say when you click into name?

My city has 75% redacted and when I click on a person, the redacted account for the an even higher percentage.

The quantity of redacted makes this mostly useless.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

It's 99% redacted, so not much help:

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 19 hours ago

Presumably their bosses have access to this info... Like...

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

On the page, USA Today have a section saying if you see a plate that has a lot of searches they want to hear from you. Might be worth letting them know which plates/officer.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am honestly impressed with USA Today for the first time in my life. Flock is fucked if these milquetoast bitches are with us.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What next, Teen Vogue or Buzzfeed?

(No but seriously I love when these places do hard hitting shit out of the blue, although it hasn't ended well in both cases).

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TMZ has been holding DC’s feet to the fire 100X more than any of the legacy media outlets this administration, too

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, how could I forget TMZ. It's so fucking backwards in 2026.

Locally, one of the most insane ones is food blogger LA Taco getting into ICE reporting and interviewing. Obviously when legacy media fails, people still try to step up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

Can’t tell. The city redacted all of the plates and usually leaves the reason blank. They have been getting called out for their willful disregard for accountability in other areas too, not that it does anything.

The county redacted 85% of the searches, which probably tracks with them doing legitimate work 20% of the time.

The goombas at the city airport spent the first year on it before suddenly realizing they could hide it. Looks like most of them were probably mostly professional and a couple were stalking.

downloadable db anywhere?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Searching your plate adds it to the list. I bet.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›