this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
329 points (99.7% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2874 readers
2 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

Please respect Lemmy.world ToS. Don't plot who should be murdered next in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The trial in the state can't move forward until double jeopardy is determined to apply or not. Did you think they just suspended the trial cause evil? Cause I'm not following your statement otherwise

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did you think they just suspended the trial cause evil?

...Yes?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's suspended because there's no point in holding a trial if it's going to be overturned on double jeopardy. It's indefinite since there's no point in scheduling a follow-up until the question of it being double jeopardy is answered.

Like, guys, stop attributing motivations to what is arguably the only way forward.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Only way forward? They didn’t have to file the double jeopardy cases in the first place. They chose to, in order to be evil and harass and torture him with the legal system to the maximum extent possible.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While normally that could be the case, but in this case he isn't getting released either way.

The trial moving forward would be the worse scenario for the defendant. The state charges are worse than the federal charges. The later or never the state case gets tried, the better for him.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The point I was making is that there used to be a human rights violation and against the First and Fifth Amendments to hold someone indefinitely without a trial. But that ended in 2014.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It is totally reasonable to criticize length of detention while denying the right to a reasonable trial in general.

However this just happens to not be applicable in this specific situation. The guy entered a guilty plea and so will not be released anyway, and he himself requested the case be dismissed causing the delay. If he went along with it, he could have had a trial sooner but wants the delay in hopes of having it dismissed. Which is totally sensible and he has literally nothing to gain by having the trial sooner given that he is almost certainly due for years of imprisonment under his guilty federal plea.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes. Yes that is evil.

Make a decision or release him. It's literally that easy (im aware courts take longer to do everything but suspending indefinitely is kind of insane)

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

"Release him"? Dude, he's in jail pending sentencing for his federal case. There is no releasing at this point. This isn't anyone twisting a knife, it's just not scheduling a new court date until the double jeopardy question is resolved. Y'all need to chill and put your heads on before you react to things.