this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
416 points (99.8% liked)

News

38841 readers
1849 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A robot was on fire. Again. It was the summer of 2024, and the cutting-edge robots inside General Dynamics’ sweltering artillery factory near Dallas were catching fire with startling regularity, according to four former workers there. This wasn’t ideal, as the plant was supposed to be churning out urgently needed artillery shells for Ukraine. The robots, giant metal arms with clamps for hands…

... The fiasco has cost American taxpayers $533 million, according to the Army. But the Army has not held General Dynamics or a key Turkish subcontractor — which provided the factory’s much-hyped but little-proven equipment — publicly accountable for the failures. Nor has it made General Dynamics pay a penny back.

Just the opposite: General Dynamics, one of the world’s largest defense companies, has been showered with new contracts, continuing its track record as one of the greatest beneficiaries of Pentagon spending. The company is still in charge of the factory. It recently announced that it will fix things there by bringing in another much-hyped but little-proven technology.

Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 65 points 5 days ago (5 children)

How long before a more serious power decides to call America's bluff? Will historians decide it'd already happened in Iran?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 58 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

How long before a more serious power decides to call America’s bluff?

It's not a game of cards. This shit gets people killed, even when Americans (or our proxies) are going to war half-cocked.

Iraq is an absolute wasteland, over a decade after the US officially ended military operations. Iran has suffered something on the order of a trillion USD in domestic infrastructure losses. Nevermind the casualties, the ecological damage (Valdez-tier Oil spill in Oman just for starters), or the excess deaths downstream of a massive economic contraction. Afghanistan tossed off the US yoke only to enter a multi-year famine, as they scramble to restructure their economy absent international trade. These are Pyrrhic victories by any measure.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the rest of the OPEC Mid-East gang are absolutely eating shit as they squat on top of trillions of dollars of petroleum products they can no longer successfully export.

Russia is going down the same road in its proxy war with NATO in Ukraine. They can stubbornly say they haven't been beaten, as an entire generation of young men is obliterated and the country's biggest export industry gets blown up piece by piece. Even the USSR's outright collapse pales in comparison to their modern day self-immolation.

Israelis are celebrating a genocide while their own country becomes a nightmare hellhole, through economic contractions and increased conscription and a steadily more paranoid and reactionary government turning on what's left of a domestic opposition.

India and Pakistan keep butting heads, to the benefit of absolutely nobody. Kashmir is a wasteland almost as badly fucked up as Afghanistan, with one pogrom after another rendering some of the most fertile territory in Asia into a depopulated wasteland.

What sane person wants to live in a country at war? It's horrible. We're way beyond the point at which anyone "wins". The only winning move is NOT TO PLAY. A lesson that only seems to sink into the human brain if you say it in Chinese.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Which of the Chinese languages?

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-says-it-will-not-renounce-use-force-over-taiwan-2024-10-16/

Because the reason it isn't happening soon is Xi's personal fears

https://thenightly.com.au/politics/xi-jinping-fears-taiwan-invasion-could-cost-him-power-never-raised-aukus-with-australia-says-former-envoy-c-22700238

They prefer to use their size to threaten over initiating wars. Which remains imperialistic.

https://chinapower.csis.org/china-increased-military-activities-indo-pacific-2025/

The rest is on point but I don't understand your exceptions for China

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because the reason it isn’t happening soon is Xi’s personal fears

No direct quotes from anyone in the Chinese government. It's all just a former ambassador from an English speaking country making speculative statements a hemisphere away.

They prefer to use their size to threaten over initiating wars.

Incoherent. A country isn't threatening merely because it is large.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Manila asserts its “indivisible, incontrovertible, and longstanding sovereignty over Bajo de Masinloc,” its term for Scarborough Shoal. It maintains that only the Philippines possesses the right to construct structures or conduct activities, including marine scientific research, within the shoal and its territorial waters.

China’s Foreign Ministry, however, reiterates Beijing’s “indisputable sovereignty” over the shoal, which it calls Huangyan Island, and its adjacent waters.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You haven't read a single one of these links.

You certainly haven't read about

kidnappings, killings, repression, illegal arrests, sabotage, etc

Committed by the Marcos and Duterte governments of The Philippines. Much less the long history of Red Tagging used to justify the pogroms.

All it takes is excusing no tribe

"Both Sides!" But always the Evil Foreigners first.

Defending a US backed military junta in the midst of monstrous crimes against humanity, because you've been pre-programmed to hate anyone outside your nation's sphere of influence.

I'm sure you clapped like a seal during the Bloody Sunday killing. Fucking MAGA fascist.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've criticized every government myself, my own (Sweden) and EU and USA and also China et al. You're just pretending to be better, and you know you can't justify defending China so you have to lie to claim I'm MAGA without knowing anything about me.

You're pre-programmed to assume people can't want to rule themselves and that anything that contradict China's desire to enforce total cultural uniformity is an evil plot by USA. Bootlicking fucking tankie. You'd applaud everything USA ever did if China claimed it was them who did it. You'd celebrate MK Ultra if China revealed they were doing that in their secret prisons for political prisoners.

When USA uses their aid programs for political pressure you're outraged and then China does it and you cheer.

https://www.industriall-union.org/curbing-violations-by-chinese-multinationals-in-african-critical-minerals-boom

Also this is a collection of links that I read before

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve criticized every government myself

Sure you have. Some slightly louder than others.

When USA uses their aid programs for political pressure you’re outraged

When they fund rape gangs and drug cartels and genocidal terror campaigns with those "aid" programs, I wish more people would.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You fucking hypocrite. You're talking about yourself.

So then why is the shutdown of USAID causing millions of deaths, not preventing them?

But we know what your opinion of that is. You think it's good that those people die so that their survival won't make people think USA is good anymore. You enjoy seeing the damage caused by Musk and Trump and co, in just the same way you enjoy seeing China hurt their minorities, because you think they all deserve it.

All because they are part of the wrong tribe. You think they supported American imperialism when they should've submitted to Chinese imperialism.

https://afridesk.org/en/chinese-mafia-expands-in-africa/

https://adf-magazine.com/2025/06/chinese-cybercrime-networks-spread-like-a-cancer-into-africa/

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/mar/12/invasive-ai-led-mass-surveillance-in-africa-violating-freedoms-warn-experts

You probably even think it's good that the Chinese mafia is taking control in many areas. That's acceptable colonialism, not because it's good for the people, but because it's Chinese. They along with Chinese intelligence may be just as bad as CIA, but you think the collateral is worth it, because the right culture or some shit like that is being established. They are making them civilized according to you. Right?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You’re talking about yourself.

Literally down to "I'm rubber, you're glue"

ADF is a professional military magazine published quarterly by U.S. Africa Command

You absolute nob. You're reading Pete Hegseth ad copy

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're the one obsessed with fucking Kegsbreath & co. My criticism is completely independent of those asswipes

Meanwhile you happily parrot the Chinese military you rube. And you're not even addressing the arguments nor providing evidence for your claim of bias.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/08/16/australia-chinese-government-menaces-uyghur-diaspora

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't disagree with any of that, are you just venting right now or are you mad at me for not sounding angry enough? Hard to tell, but either way yeah agree.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just venting.

All too often, I see people treat war as some kind of sporting event rather than a socially acceptable form of genocide.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago

Gotcha. I didn't mean to sound glib or disinterested. In my head that was a sort of Dan Carlinish pronouncement of horror, laden with gravitas.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To me, it reads like they're just venting.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Probably. It's just hard to tell when the discourse is so overheated lately. I feel like everyone sane is mad enough to condone murder but too stricken with learned helplessness to do it themselves. And maybe a certain subset that are also cursed with enough conscience to believe that violence perpetuates violence. We all need to vent sometimes, but I almost feel like it'sa waste of good rage.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The only thing I'd say in defense of a good venting is that for change to happen, enough people have to decide that the consequences of taking action are less bad than not doing that, and a big part of that is online dialogue. The more of us that agree about these things, the more it leads to eventual action.

The problem is that getting to that point is difficult and often requires a catalyst that we haven't yet had.

But all of our online angst does help build a foundation that future change can spring from. While that may sound hopeless - and it ain't roses and daisies for sure - still, it will help. Eventually. Hopefully.

But I get it. I've mostly stopped reading the articles about The Latest Stupidity Trump Has Said Or Done because I'm exhausted by it. It feels useless, and some of it is demoralizing. But I think most of the discussion helps lay down that foundation that I hope we build a new society upon.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I just hate the feeling that we're all just yelling at each other when we should be scaring billionaires.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

¿Por qué no los dos?

Doing one does not prevent doing the other.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

meanwhile, as all this chaos and destruction is happening, who is getting wildly rich?

around 3,000 families control wealth equal to 15-17% of global GDP.

In 2025, the world’s 12 richest men owned more wealth than half of humanity.

add to that, billionaires are increasingly influencing global politics as governmental advisors or by tipping scales in elections... when they're not getting rich directly off military contracts and reconstruction/real estate deals on the land they just got paid to help "liberate".

the planet is being steered into apocalypse by a handful of madmen.

and with climate perma-crises on the horizon, "disaster capitalism" is going into overdrive.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Sort of. A competent leader would have been able to put Iran over a barrel through avenues other than wasting missiles on hard targets. But it's certainly shown the weakness of the US when there are useful idiots in power. The US is supposed to be able to project power anywhere in the world, and we're clearly unable to do that right now.

But even so, there's no risk of actual boots on the ground invasion in the US. Even with an absolute moron in charge, the mere fact that we control the land coast to coast severely restricts any potential invader. They'd have to do a Normandy up and down both coasts, or convince Canada or Mexico to help them do a Belarus.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I dare to armchair general that it might be more than just incompetence.

Ukraine's military has been saying for a few years that while NATO plans, strategies and tactics were useful at the start of the war, they have been irrelevant and even detrimental for a few years now, small drones have completely changed warfare.

In addition to a country that has been arguably preparing for an assymetrical war for maybe 40-60 years, Iran is one of four countries with the most knowledge of current drone tactics now; the other three being Ukraine, Russia and China.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Don't forget Taiwan. They are in a similar position to Ukraine with China wanting to just take over. And China 100% would need a D-day style ambiguous assault. Except Taiwan obviously expects that, and can easily see the build up and launch. And weather in the region severely limits options for a successful assault for a lot of the year.

[–] magikmw@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I love that ambiguous assault autocorrelation.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 4 points 4 days ago

Oh gods, where is this attack coming from? What are they hoping to achieve? Who even are they?

[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The terrain makes it hard for China to try an invasion as well and if they do try, Taiwan is going to disable their crown jewels instead of letting China have them.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wendover actually released a video about a week ago about an invasion of Taiwan that goes into all of this.

Youtube link
Nebula Link

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

Taiwan doesn't have a lot of experience with using them, but OTOH they are collaborating with Ukraine. Supplying them with components and getting intel back on what works.

https://dset.tw/en/event-news-en/492-2/

[–] cy888@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Taiwan just needs the ability to take down one dam and PRC is in trouble

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Taiwan won't be able to send a drone flying 300 km over China, they aren't gonna screw up air defense line Russia. Striking deep will require either smuggling things in or building weapons from inside their borders. If China expected a hot war to start I'd expect them to lead with heavy amplification of internal surveillance and hunting possible threats to remove as many internal threats as possible.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago

or convince Canada or Mexico to help them do a Belarus.

Honestly, that's probably not completely off the table at this point.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

I don't think anyone's invading the US. I think hundreds of years of pax Americana (wrt ocean trade) are ending though and it may mean a return to mercantilism and the mass poverty it creates.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah I feel like it’s happening now with Iran, but I guess it is too soon to really assess

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think Iran just did. I should invest in a popcorn supplier.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd invest in dried goods, buddy, I promise you we'll stop getting food before the MIC stops getting bank

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Canned goods: Am I joke to you?

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Who would be a "more serious power"? China just executed 3 of their "rocket generals" in the last year because they figured out more than half of the ICBMs were either filled with water with the fuel sold on the black market, or were cemented shut but made to look like they opened. Their new ships they're building are catching fire at an insane rate. Their new generation whatever the fuck number they made up fighter is confirmed to be a flying tank.

Russia has military from when my grandpa was born with a handful of non ancient things to show off to the world. Plus Russian production is known for its quality /s.

Who's left to be a "serious power"?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Israel just sicced the US on a mildly scrappy regional power and all they were able to do is make Iran less reasonable and now they're looking like they're running out of ammo.

So, literally whomever shows up to fight next I'll withhold judgment until after... Let's say the third time Trump declares victory.