this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
449 points (97.7% liked)
Work Reform
17385 readers
1890 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you make $176K your SS payout is $5,251/mo.
If you make $5M your SS payout is $5,251/mo.
If we remove the cap on contributions, is it fair to remove the cap on payouts?
(My personal answer is no, but it is hard to argue about the lack of equity in that case. The original cap on both ends was built with that in mind)
If you're making $5M a year, you likely will never need any payout. Its the whole point of a progressive tax system. The wealthy can afford to pay more, and require less support from the state.
Counterpoint: anyone paying any amount of social security tax is part of the working class, even if they're making $5M/yr. Increasing taxes on the working class isn't going to solve wealth unequally. We need to tax wealth.
I agree we need to tax wealth, but I'm fine with removing the cap on paying into social security. The system is going to break as it is, and needs more money flowing in. And the government needs to be barred from diverting that money to other things. If it had been treated as a hands of retirement fund, we wouldn't even have this issue.
You can even esssentially take the same rule - the payout is a curve, not a flat line. People near the cap get proportionally less payout. All we need to do is continue that thought so the xurve flattens out