Selfhosted

59939 readers

285 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

555

Beware Hollywood’s digital demolition: it’s as if your favourite films and TV shows never existed (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Last June, fans of Comedy Central – the long-running channel behind beloved programmes such as The Daily Show and South Park – received an unwelcome surprise. Paramount Global, Comedy Central’s parent company, unceremoniously purged the vast repository of video content on the channel’s website, which dated back to the late 1990s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 43 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The only way to watch the original Star Wars movies before George completely fucked with them is piracy.

The 4K77, 80 and 83 editions are what you're after. Enjoy. There are apparently reduced noise versions as well, but I thought it was perfect as is. It's old. It's supposed to have noise and grain. The desert scenes in the first one are really noisy and I'm not 100% sure why. Maybe he filmed those on cheaper film stock in smaller cameras, but that's just a guess.

[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The director was an amateur, and he didn't align the grains of sand with the grain of the film.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago

It’s not his fault that sand is coarse, rough, and irritating, or that it gets everywhere.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They were course and rough and irritating and got everywhere.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The late 90s dvd versions are gold.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago

I do have a double set with original (or as much as you could get) along with the post-prequels completely broken one. I think there was a pre-prequels version as well. But then that is DVD quality, which is getting on a bit.

The likes of Disney+ doesn't even acknowledge the originals even exist.

Same with their Alien and Aliens versions as well. No director's cuts at all, which is a shame as I far prefer them. They should have both.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago

There was a storm in the desert where they were filming which destroyed a lot of the equipment and almost doomed the film.
I think I remember reading that they had to use cheaper film stock in those scenes for that reason.