this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
197 points (97.6% liked)
Map Enthusiasts
6279 readers
4 users here now
For the map enthused!
Rules:
-
post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps
-
be nice
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This shows how incredibly biased wikipedia is. I don't think there is a single place in Perus mountains that is not in sight of an Inca ruin. I would bet a lot of money they beat germanies 25.000 by at least a factor of 10.
Still cool, but its more of a "map of sights that have a wikipedia article" than a "map of castles and ruins"
I have also thought about Inca ruins because of its history. Thank you for this comment.
Wikipedia should have some of them covered, but I have to get it parsed differently than castles in UK for example. I will try to solve it later see if I can get some of them at least verified and include them on the map.
Yeah I think many of them are also listed as part of a larger archeological site and not individual buildings. The palace of the Inca at Machu Picchu doesn't have its own page on wikipedia.
For most ruins I fear they are not listed online anywhere at all
Edit: maybe turning it around and going with OSM data first and then linking the sites to wikipedia is more effective? OSM has pretty good searchable databases of archeological sites and individual buildings. The royal palace is listed as a "manor house" in close proximity to the "tourist attraction and archeological site" of Machu Picchu
Thanks! I managed to add something in Peru now https://thecastlemap.com/changelog/