politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments


Oh. So, we're outraged about this...but when he's already labeling "leftists" as literal terrorists, we haven't quite found our outrage yet?
We can be outraged about more than one thing.
What is your basis for saying no one is outraged about this administration targeting leftists? I've seen nothing but outrage.
A third of the U.S. thinks that anyone to the left of the most conservative Democrat is a communist, while many centrists normalize fascism on a regular basis.
Source for those stats?
Polls have repeatedly demonstrated that around a third of Americans support Trump's policy positions on nearly everything; here's a graph with multiple issues listed to demonstrate (source):
Your statement isn't about support. You made blanket statements about who thinks what about communism and fascism.
Your brother
The fact that he is allowed to continue to do it.
Except you changing it to "no one" is a strawman, that was not the claim. The claim was "we" which I suppose is meant as the American population preferably a majority of the population.
Why are you acting like an apologist for normalizing the increasing psychopathy of the American society?
Sure, I should've stuck to a strict definition of the poorly defined thing that you "suppose" means something that wasn't at all indicated in the comment. Makes sense.
The comment made two claims:
I said:
Using "we" or "no one" is immaterial in that sentence in this context. It's not more than just not repeating the same words again and again for readability. No sensible person took that to be an ask for evidence that literally not one single person was outraged. The crux of the question, as written above, is "What evidence supports your claim?" Using your assumed definition, I'd have the same question about both claims instead of just one. My main point that we can be outraged about more than one thing would be unchanged.
I'm not. You're just failing to think clearly.
Guess what, he will continue to be allowed to do more outrageous things after this one too. Society STILL isn't sufficiently outraged to stop this. Maybe what will finally end this will be something stupid like he outlawed pizza pockets
I’ve seen a lot of whining and complaining online, and a lot of people desperate to signal that they’re the “good Americans.”
If you were outraged you’d be doing something about it. You’re MUCH too comfortable to be outraged.
Who me?
Yes, you.
You sound tough, Captain Discomfort. What you bench bro?
Also, I'm Canadian. Not particularly interested in being a good American. Or any kind, really.
As am I. Why are you giving them a pass on their inaction?
I have no idea what they're individually doing or not doing.
But in the interest of national unity, I'll join you in the most Canadian of pastimes: talking shit about Americans.
Fuck you, you American bastards! Fix your dumb country, you fucking hosers.
And your plan of action is?
To watch MAGA give your country what it clearly deserves and hope that it’s awful enough to be a cautionary example for the rest of us.
Why do you want him to hurt Canada? What did we do?
So you’re a Canadian, asking me, another Canadian, what MY plan of action is to, what, step in and do what Americans are too cowardly to do?
What are you even doing here aside from giving cover to subhuman trash?
I'm asking you because you're the one who keeps demanding people do something and demeaning everyone you interact with for not doing something, without even asking if they're American. What are YOU doing about it?
Up until now, it was pretty easy to tell who was American- they were the ones being shitty and belligerent and defensive. Congratulations on being indistinguishable from the clowns.
Unfortunately that's been happening since before most who are going to read this message were even born. Ask the weathermen or the Black Panther Party for self-defense.
Who’s the weatherman?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
Thanks!
The Weathermen were, objectively speaking, terrorists. Their praxis was to scare the politicians into stopping the various imperialist wars.
Noble goals (and that bathroom in the Pentagon had it coming) but they were terrorists.
True and if we're being thorough even Fox News is a form of or feeding terrorism. But I think it would be important to compare and contrast with events such as the move bombing in 1985. Whether or not you were 100% on board with MOVE's praxis. What the police did was a terrorist attack that destroyed the community in many ways. Not just MOVE. But they can't be terrorist, they're police. Tulsa race massacre, ditto. If you really want to get base level, the state itself is terrorist. If you question it's authority how will it answer.
It's a term so misused as we are seeing now. It's just treated as "enemy" anymore. People need to get used to it, and understand those in power are their enemy. That they should be afraid. That terrorism itself isn't bad inherently. It's all about who's targeted and why. A culpable organization like the Pentagon and the MIC. Or unconnected random, perhaps even ally families and individuals.
I've been in a constant state of outrage since before he was elected. Everything going on is an outrage. Numerous outrageous things are happening, any one of which should have alone been enough to end this administration. Yet here we are. Outrage is just the norm now.