this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
249 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

7133 readers
54 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Batteries do not last forever.

These dodgy companies have it far too easy with apathetic consumerists. No wonder the world is on fire.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about AAA batteries that are charged by the device with USB-C?

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure of the advantage, docking the device instead of putting the batteries in a recharger? The batteries do not need to be charged that often anyway, and that would increase the cost of every device, as opposed to just buying one charger that should last for a very, very long time.

Putting batteries in a charger isn't difficult.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Batteries of a mouse don't need to be charged that often. But how about flashlights, headphones and the like? Internal batteries have their uses. Even with a mouse, you could still use it while it charged.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I guess that would depend on how often you used the torch, for me rechargeable batteries last for years in them.

My headphones have a cord, because logic (for my use case anyway). I have no idea how long batteries tend to last in cordless ones.

So with the mouse, what you are saying is that you could use it while it was plugged in with a cord?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah jesus as if its that simple, one size doesnt fit all.

I am all for consumer regulations, I just have a preference for what I am currently looking for. A solar keyboard is niche and cool.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Options. Your preference is fine honestly. Options simply don't exist though. That's the problem.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you believe good options don't exist?

Demand creates supply

Apathetic consumers get trash

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did that thing called "look for options" and came up completely empty.

And we live in a supply side economics world so not really.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You live in a supply side economy due to choice.

The people have the power, they just do not have the will.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you so much for the enlightenment

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

sarcasm and apathy are not friends.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Exactly, make then make two versions and add an ewaste charge to non replaceable. They are making two versions of everything anyway.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are things much more important than your preferences

If it was all just about my preferences, we would all be using corded... better, simpler, less waste.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And consumer tech would never progress.

Trying things is good R&D is good. Bringing things to market is good. If it is wasteful address it but outright banning is a bit heavyhanded. Stick an ewaste tax on it and mandate that no matter what the minimum price difference between the models has to be the value of that tax.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Non-replaceable batteries are bad, but they are far form new, they have already been tried and are known to be deliberately anti-consumer, which is why the eu is doing something about it. Every single person does not need to buy ewaste for something to be known as ewaste.

Consumer tech would have progressed a great deal more if consumers had standards. At the moment it has just gone from bigger number better, to put ai in the name. Tech is meant to be better than that, sustainability is a massive part of long term viability due to finite resources.