Context: Admiral Patrick replied and included this gem:
And might I add that not one person complained until db0 went internet Karen with his hissy fit because I took his toy away from him.
"Not one person complained about my explicitly obfuscated blacklists! Damn internet Karens making a big deal!"
Making a blacklist for your frontend is one thing.
Not telling users about it is an entirely different, more fucked up thing.
Purposefully disguising block as technical difficulties instead of deliberate blocks is yet another level of different and more fucked up.
A blacklist that users are informed of and therefore (presumably) consent to when using the software, I could understand. I still don't entirely agree with it, but I understand.
But each of the additional levels of fucked-up-ness turn it from understandable to despicable. Absolutely fuck that dev in every which way.
Yeah, but seeing myself on line 1208 of the super-secret banned list made me feel far more dangerous and badass than I deserve. I feel like I'm barely a decent person, but I'm still working on it; apparently, that makes me a radical.
I would love an anti fascist blocklist
Do you really run into that many fascists on Lemmy? (As long as you're not counting tankies as fascist, I guess. Which they're technically not quite.)
And the statement that it wasn't encrypted, just compressed, is an entirely antagonistic reframing.
There were multiple block lists. Some right in the open, and one that was stored as a monolithic .dat (I assume the one he called "compressed").
The end result is that the second list was obfuscated from not only end-users, but also "admins" hosting it, and developers attempting to work on the project.
The compression decision only holds if all of the filter lists were compressed and this decision was clearly documented.
Plus the circumstantial evidence that the "enable toxic mode" option did not in fact disable the filtering that relied on the .dat file.
I can't even say that I'm in theory against his openly stated goals of making the fediverse more approachable to normies. But this is not the way to implement it, and it's not the way to react when called out about it.
If you want something approachable for normies, Facebook is right there.
IMO, the fediverse should be weird and stay weird. It doesn't need to grow huge, it doesn't need to become a normie website or a household name.
I'm more than OK with weird. I love weird. I'm even ok with strong political opinions that I don't always agree with. I'm fine with Lemmy staying small in the hopes it never ends up becoming an eternal September situation.
Those aren't the issue.The problem is the violent rhetoric combined with the intense and constant bad-jacketing. Constant jumping to bad conclusions about other users and arguing against those straw men instead of trying for good faith.
At least you only jumped to the conclusion that I wanted Lemmy to stop being weird and grow unsustainably popular. I was honestly expecting someone to call me a corporate stooge or that I'm just a butthurt MAGA chud upset that Lemmy leans left-wing, then tell me to kill myself.
Word bad step on lego immediately
Well, I don't want you to feel disappointed, so here goes: you're a person who likes money and you're just upset that my virtue signalling is of higher fidelity! You should go get a coin and put it on your shoulder, so you get alarmed by the sudden clattering when you forget it's there and it hits the floor!
Is that enough vitriol for you?