this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
46 points (58.3% liked)

Science Memes

20722 readers
1321 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Ideally we figure out some sweet Nuclear Fusion.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the Fusion Reactors that are coming soon (TM) (promised decades ago).

We need energy now, not at some unknown point in the future. Of course, resaeching this technology may make sense. But it does not help today and also not the next 20 years.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 12 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, putting your hopes / goals on a fusion powered future is foolish at this point.

But I def support (lots of) research into it.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cold fusion has been 10 years away since early 1960s.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It will come right after the year of Desktop Linux (I wish)

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Deskto pLinux is here, and it's fine. I wish it was more popular but that doesn't stop me from doing all my development, video editing, music , gaming on Linux.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Having become a carbon neutral economy a couple years ago since we obviously adhere to the Paris agreement this does not seem like a good solution as we already (would have to have) deployed solutions based on current technology.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Agree that we can get to carbon neutral / carbon negative with current tech.

I do think making plans based on having it are foolish at best.

But I do think we need to keep working on research of it. If we ever hope to achieve a world with "electricity too cheap to meter", nuclear fusion is the key to it. (That and dyson spheres, but that's kinda not in scope of discussion).

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago

Electric power too cheap to meter exists and it's called solar power.

Renewables are dirt cheap. Hoping for even more abundance is forgetting that it's already ridiculous.