this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

15106 readers
200 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Microsoft/id desperately trying to salvage some good will after announcing a tonne of layoffs?

Fuck that noise.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 week ago

games usually remove denuvo when sales are less than the cost to keep the denuvo subscription up. denuvo is not a one time purchase for devs

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, because microsoft's fortunes lie with the couple thousand that didn't buy this game due to denuvo. C'mon man. It was probably too expensive to keep paying denuvo since they were sunsetting the studio anyway.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They did the same with Eternal before, you’re just hating for sake of hating

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I’m probably being overly skeptical - but even if the timing was already locked in before the announced cuts at id and elsewhere; you can’t argue that they wouldn’t at least be trying to shift the news cycle across.