this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
33 points (92.3% liked)

RPGMemes

11222 readers
402 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
33
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they'd have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You're misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, I don't know enough about the English language to recognise the difference. What would the phrase be in future tense?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

No. He's trolling you. No Reasonable person thinks this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

If the creature dies it can be restored to life only by means of...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not misreading anything. "The creature can only..." applies a new state to the creature. After that state has been applied, or somehow reversed (unaware of any way to do this by RAW), then the creature can only be brought back to life by the means mentioned in the spell.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes you are. You're intentionally abusing a weakness in English language (present and future tense are often written the same way so must be inferred by context) to assume something clearly not intended by the 2 sentences considered holistically.

It's a funny joke. +1, but, ain't no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously. 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ain't no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously

I absolutely would, my players would need to be creative to allow this dust pile to communicate and do anything, but I'm quite sure they could manage

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

New villain is a cleaner with a feather duster +1.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was legit imaging a pile of dust that learns telepathy to communicate with their party members and screams in an angry scotch accent to be thrown at their enemies so that their particles might sting the bastards eyes and blind them

They'd be deathly afraid of any and all cleaning staff, but also the party would have a broom and catch pan of some sort for when their buddy get a lil spilt

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I was thinking they might learn or get enchanted with a minor wind cantrip that they can cast on themselves infinite times, and rearrange themselves into words.

They can communicate with any literate character, but slowly, only in words that are short enough. Otherwise they have fo finish the word on their next turn.

If it's genuinely windy in game, the player has to write their communication with their off hand, blindfold whilst someome shakes them or the paper randomly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's like this for all TTRPGs. Someone always be tryin to game the system. 😎

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's like this for all TTRPGs. Someone always be trying to rules lawyer away someone's fun. 😎

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey, that rules-lawyering is someone's fun!